Clint,

Being an old SPITBOL hack, I see reason to do this if it can be done right.  I 
have a sense of where things are happening and where they should happen in 
Unicon/icont.  I can see that is bigger than an MS (part of me wonders if I 
could get an MS for it ... but I havent likely got the time even if I could).

I can see it's tricky.  Hence my comments on overloading in general and || 
specifically.

Thinking from the path diagram representation of patterns, I see && and /.| as 
two forms of block structure concatenation.  They just use different fields.  
How the pattern interpreter works on them is its business.  :)

David





________________________________
From: Clinton Jeffery <[email protected]>
To: Steve Wampler <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Thu, August 5, 2010 3:57:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Unicon-group] SNOBOL operators - a few questions

I am mostly enjoying this conversation without butting in, but this comment 
regarding the trade-offs and relative parity between S4 and Icon points out my 
motivation for wanting to
pursue this further: I believe it is possible to obtain the 
best-of-both-worlds, 
or at least a
good approximation of it.  But it is a big job and the language design part is 
deeper than
an M.S. thesis normally gets.

Clint


On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Steve Wampler <[email protected]> wrote:

My experience comparing what I did in S4 with what I do in Icon/Unicon is
>that while S4 PM let me succinctly describe the matching process, by the time
>I added in the code to actually do things with the results, it wasn't
>that much more terse than Icon/Unicon, and a lot harder for me to understand.
>(Then again, I know Icon/Unicon very well - I'm *sure* someone whose
>knowledge of the two languages is reversed from mine would have a
>different point-of-view!)
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by 

Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Unicon-group mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group

Reply via email to