Clint, I'm thinking through some of the challenges and will probably post further questions/ideas. I'll revisit the thesis and take a look. I probably need to understand a bit more about the under the covers implementation. However, the questions may have value in themselves. They probably should be moved to the ldif list rather than here in the general mailing list.
Thanks David ________________________________ From: Clinton Jeffery <[email protected]> To: David Gamey <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Sent: Sun, August 8, 2010 11:27:50 PM Subject: Re: [Unicon-group] SNOBOL operators - a few questions David, Fair enough, I didn't take your comment personally and would not try and contradict Sudarshan's self-assessment; he did not have an eval() function for generating new code on the fly and what he did in that particular part of the implementation may indeed be a kludge. Cheers, Clint On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 7:46 PM, David Gamey <[email protected]> wrote: Sorry, I should have been clearer. Sudarshan himself refers to one of the sub-components (unevaluated expressions if I recall) as a kludge. >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Unicon-group mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group
