In a message dated 12/6/2004 11:48:10 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The FOCP Board won't take action on any proposal until such time they get a report from the Planning Bommitee. There was a motion passed to encourage all dog owners to properly license and leash their dogs. With all the humility that I usually flout around here, I had suggested
privately that FOCP establish a special class of canine membership. This wasn't
facetious (a fact that surprised all who know and therefore love me).
Rather:
a) primarily, a way to get a handle on people who take advantage of the
park to get their dogs out-of-doors and socialized (not in the realpolitikal
sense, Kerry/Edwards lost the election), so they could be communicated with
directly on canine issues;
b) secondarily, a way to raise a few bucks from folks to whom the park is
important by means of things like Clark Park pet chatzkies.
The communication channel could be a form of alerting and incentivization,
which -- in an erudite, sophisticated, dare-I-say anointed community like ours
-- would be far more effective and appropriate than dime dropping everyone who
lets Fido off the leash to one of the three gestapo agencies who patrol our
highways and byways.
The suggestion either got forgotten or tossed into the nearest
street-corner wire-mesh UCD trash magnet.
Always at
your service and ready for a dialog, Al Krigman |
- Re: [UC] FOCP board meeting -- dog committee recommendations ... Krfapt
- Re: [UC] FOCP board meeting -- dog committee recommendat... FX Winkler
- Re: [UC] FOCP board meeting -- dog committee recommendat... BGAndersen
- Re: [UC] FOCP board meeting -- dog committee recommendat... FX Winkler
- Re: [UC] FOCP board meeting -- dog committee recommendat... Anthony West
- Re: [UC] FOCP board meeting -- dog committee recommendat... Mark Krull
- Re: [UC] FOCP board meeting -- dog committee recommendat... Benseraglio2