Sam: Please accept my apologies for, apparently, unfairly linking you with Andy. All you violent-prone thug-types look the same to me.
Jonathan A. Cass -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Samuel Nicolary Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 7:55 AM To: Herons Cc: univcity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character Only "highly" offensive? I would have thought that this would be more on the "patent" level of offense. And for what record? Sometimes I can barely draw meaning from what people write anymore because I get so distracted by all the cliche sentence fragments with which people chose to communicate. If there is a record - can we append this to it? If I am going to assault someone I would never use a weapon. Jonathan gets me confused with lazy gun-toting mongrels like Andy Diller. I prefer a more savage and primal form of violence if it comes to that sort of encounter. I am _patently_ offended that Jonathan would imply otherwise. Harrumph, Sam Nicolary On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Herons wrote: > Re: "...perhaps you would be interested in taking some vigilante action while > exercising your Second Amendment "rights"?" > > For the record: > > I find it highly offensive even to joke about using a gun to intimidate - or > shoot - someone simply because he's a stranger, even a "suspicious" one. To do > so in a public forum makes it worse. > > If that isn't enough of a deterrent from making casual and callous statements, > keep this in mind: you never know how long that e-mail will live. Or how many > copies have been made of it, how many archives it may appear in years from > now, or how far in the future it may come back to embarrass or harm. > > > Al > Airone > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan Cass" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <univcity@list.purple.com> > Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 11:01 PM > Subject: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character > > > > This evening there was a older African American man (40s or 50s, heavy set, > > about 5'6" or 5"7") on our street (4600 block of Larchwood) walking with a > > rotweiller dog, off the leash. This was the second time he was seen > > lingering on the street and appears to be up to no good (i.e., possibly > > casing houses). I would suggest that everyone keep a look out for him. > > > > Andy, Sam, perhaps you would be interested in taking some vigilante action > > while exercising your Second Amendment "rights"? > > > > Jonathan A. Cass > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________ > > Sent via the WebMail system at mail.sbvlaw.com > > > > > > > > > > ---- > > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the > > list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see > > <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. > > ---- > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the > list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see > <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. > ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
