I think the real thing to consider here is that there was confusion about an issue, and instead of fiercely railing on with no facts, as so very often happens here, Tony Went to the source and came back with an extremely well written answer to our questions. We should all say "thank you" and learn from his example. I know much more about neighborhood designation right now than I did when I went to bed last night. In the future, when we're not sure about something, we should go to the source instead of abstractly complaining about things we don't know. Tony also gets major kudos for bothering to post that his initial assessment was incorrect. All too often people decide that it's better to be factually wrong than caught being factually wrong, even on something as silly as this, and will hold tenaciously to an incorrect assumption rather than simply say "oops, you were right". We have much to learn here. Thanks Tony for your efforts.
That's my two cents. Kyle -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 5:38 AM To: Anthony West; UnivCity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] Be true to your Planning Analysis Sector (Was: New Marketing Campaign) In other, more concise words, you were wrong and the stickers are indeed in West Philadelphia. There. That was easy, wasn't it? One simple sentence. By the way, "all the fuss" was mostly *you* refusing to admit that the boundaries, in their fluidity, had changed. Frank On Apr 6, 2007, at 05:14 AM, Anthony West wrote: ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
