A non-profit running an adult literacy program is comparable to a non-profit running a Business Improvement District. In order to undertake any activity in the public sphere at all -- and worthy activity in the public sphere is the chief function of any 501(c)(3) -- it must choose specific programs that are inherently at risk of being controversial. So to set a standard of universal contentment as the benchmark for any non-profit's legitimacy is absurd, an impossible test to meet.

One problem not only Ray, but also others on list at times fall prey to, is the habit of treating UCD as if it were sui generis, a thing of a kind. In truth, it falls into various classes of agent, all of which have existing rules and regulators. You may or may not be satisfied by these rules and regulators. If you don't like them, let's put some thought into how they might be revised. That's the only useful direction I see for this thread, and the laudable purpose for which Ray started it. If it's just to be another naughty-naughty-UCD list ... yawn ... goodness, what time is it ... g'night, all....

-- Tony West

----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

 idea: ucd should remain scrupulously neutral in public
       questions/disputes/contests, not taking sides or
       even appearing to take sides.

A good precept politically, perhaps, but an impossible for any agency to carry out operationally in any walk of life. To follow your reasoning strictly, an adult-literacy program that choose to employ Curriculum A should refrain from taking any action as long as there were public advocates of Curriculum B. It would be better, you are in effect proposing, for there to be no literacy programs at all, than controversial literacy programs.

That's not what his reasoning says at all. He's saying that the adult- literacy program should choose the Curriculum without input from UCD.

Frank


----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to