[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
melani, when wendell was interviewed by uc review, maybe he
could have mentioned, for the readers' benefit, that fenton
works with blackwell now.
Melani Lamond wrote:
How would a statement about John's current employment have improved Lewis'
response? Do you think the Review should have made the statement, if
clarification was needed?
it's simply this: ucd needs to maintain a supportive working
relationship with blackwell as we all move forward. [you
snipped that part out of my response above.]
two weeks ago uc review reported a serious rift between ucd
and blackwell, between ucd and the community. in his
interview in the uc review this week, wendell does not seem
to have appreciated that. and now you're asking for positive
suggestions for change, what wendell could have done to have
a better outcome. I've suggested that wendell could have
acknowledged -- candidly and constructively -- that fenton
is now working for blackwell, and that it would go a long
way towards mending bridges between ucd, blackwell and the
community as we move forward.
it's understandable that this doesn't make sense to you if
you believe that ucd is on bad terms with blackwell and
fenton, but it's not clear what you do expect of wendell's
leadership of ucd, or what you think positive suggestions
for change look like.
..................
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
[aka laserbeam®]
[aka ray]
SERIAL LIAR. CALL FOR RATES.
"It is very clear on this listserve who
these people are. Ray has admitted being
connected to this forger." -- Tony West
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
