Turner,Kathleen wrote:
> If I were to leave my current position and accept a position with >
another employer in the area, I really do not believe that my former >
employer would have the right to make public any information about my >
new employment.
> > I could, my new employer could, but I think it would be unethical,
if > not illegal (Paul?) for my former employer to do so.
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN wrote:
in the news it's quite common to read about people working in non-profit
organizations who resign their positions and go on to do 'x y or z'.
yes, it is.
it's even quite common, in the news, for the resigner's employer/boss to
say a few words about the person resigning.
yep.
and when you DON'T read about these details, in the news, when there's a
resignation, that, too, is news.
uh-huh.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which if true doesn't address Kathleen's point as to the source of the
information - the former employer, the employee or the new employer.
the source of the news is the employer.
for example:
http://www.upenn.edu/almanac/between/2004/tr_resign.html
- - -
but all this is nitpicking. the real issue is that wendell
and the uc review are leaving john fenton and the reader
hanging with 'WHERE IS JOHN FENTON' -- when he's RIGHT HERE!
..................
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
[aka laserbeam®]
[aka ray]
SERIAL LIAR. CALL FOR RATES.
"It is very clear on this listserve who
these people are. Ray has admitted being
connected to this forger." -- Tony West
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
