I have seen comparisons of a 300 604e and a 233 G3 and the G3 is about the same. That might make a 350 604e a bit faster than a 220 G3 in most uses that don't use Altivec.
If your Mac works with the L2 in it then it is OK. I have had some 7600s to work with the cache left in. PowerLogix software lets you disable the L2 through the software and it may work with the Newertech? Roger On Thursday, October 17, 2002, at 08:26 PM, in2palmtrees wrote: > > Also, would a 350MHZ > 604e card be faster than the 220MHZ G3 even though > it's a 604e? > > -- Unsupported OS X is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> Unsupported OS X list info <http://lowendmac.com/lists/unsupported.html> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:UnsupportedOSX@;mail.maclaunch.com> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:UnsupportedOSX-off@;mail.maclaunch.com> For digest mode, email: <mailto:UnsupportedOSX-digest@;mail.maclaunch.com> Subscription questions: <mailto:listmom@;lemlists.com> Archive <http://www.mail-archive.com/unsupportedosx%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
