But the G3 does not have Altivec. That arrived with the G4. Jim Snyder
----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I have seen comparisons of a 300 604e and a 233 G3 and the G3 is about > the same. That might make a 350 604e a bit faster than a 220 G3 in most > uses that don't use Altivec. > > On Thursday, October 17, 2002, at 08:26 PM, in2palmtrees wrote: > > > > > Also, would a 350MHZ > > 604e card be faster than the 220MHZ G3 even though > > it's a 604e? -- Unsupported OS X is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> Unsupported OS X list info <http://lowendmac.com/lists/unsupported.html> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:UnsupportedOSX@;mail.maclaunch.com> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:UnsupportedOSX-off@;mail.maclaunch.com> For digest mode, email: <mailto:UnsupportedOSX-digest@;mail.maclaunch.com> Subscription questions: <mailto:listmom@;lemlists.com> Archive <http://www.mail-archive.com/unsupportedosx%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
