> Linux on Mac OS X isn't about function, it's about credibility. Even if > OS X were to develop a Linux binary compatibility layer (and so far, > none of you have said the notion is *technically* flawed) I doubt it > would see much use. But what it would do is send a strong message of > compatibility to the community at large, especially the business > community. "All this, and Linux apps too".
We already *have* "all this and Linux apps too". If Apple is looking at emulation on the Power architecture, then what they should be looking at is not Linux, it's AIX. -- Unsupported OS X is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> Unsupported OS X list info <http://lowendmac.com/lists/unsupported.html> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive <http://www.mail-archive.com/unsupportedosx%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
