Peter da Silva wrote:
I got 10.1 on an almost stock 7600 with 96M and a Barracuda. It took more than one full day (wall-clock time) for the install to complete.
You win. I did the same with a 7500 with 112MB and it took 16.5 hours continuous HD churning. Once it finished, it was very slow, the letters I typed came on screen three or four late, but . . .
I did ALL the optimization things, such as switch video to thousands, kill the shadows, change the 'skin from Aqua to a very plain version, moved the swap file to another drive, kill all unnecessary processes, etc. It actually became useable, with real-time typing and even having several app.s open at once.
I'd still get more memory, a bigger HD, and 10.2 before messing with it myself. Kris Tilford
-- Unsupported OS X is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/>
Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>
Unsupported OS X list info <http://lowendmac.com/lists/unsupported.html> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive <http://www.mail-archive.com/unsupportedosx%40mail.maclaunch.com/>
Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
