I find his arguments ludicrous. Let me see some examples of english like programming languages where a command could mean two different things without any arguments supplied. What a preposterous thing to say! I can only think he came right out of college into whatever teaching position he now holds. BTW this is the kind of "my way is better than your way" of thinking I alluded to in another post. For example, almost all the people I have ever talked to in the past who *hate* Apple computers (their words not mine) have never actually used one. This guy has obviously (as Al points out) never actually USED an english like development language.
Bob On Feb 23, 2012, at 12:40 PM, Alejandro Tejada wrote: > Look here: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_81jDNLq2g > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lNWFzAJWys > > This is part of the videos of this free course about building webcrawlers: > http://www.udacity.com/view#Course/cs101/CourseRev/feb2012/Unit/2001/Nugget/1002 > > Interesting enough, I believe than the real answer is not that ambiguous. > He does not know about LiveCode... > > Al > > -- > View this message in context: > http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Why-him-does-not-use-a-natural-language-for-programming-tp4415191p4415191.html > Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
