Jackie: I’m not at all concerned about the BAF. Perhaps I’ve missed some critical info, but comments have been made about zip and pdf support perhaps not being in the indie versions. This would trouble me. They seem like the kind of widely used technology that would attract serious developers, who are not yet at the BAF level of need, to Livecode.
Regards, Bill > On Aug 17, 2015, at 10:39 AM, J. Landman Gay <jac...@hyperactivesw.com> wrote: > > On 8/17/2015 10:29 AM, William Prothero wrote: >> The idea that the livecode vision would be “frozen in time” and future >> enhancements would be charged extra, certainly is contrary to what I >> had expected. > > If we're talking about the BAF, I think people are still missing the key info > Brett provided. The BAF is not the same product as the current LiveCode. It > is a new addition that doesn't work with existing stacks, targeted to a > different user base. > > It doesn't affect either Indy users or open source users, which remain in > sync. > > -- > Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com > HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com > > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
