I don't understand why the OSS version won't work for you if it's a 'hobby' thing (a term that seems belittling to me). The Community version is NOT a 'weenie' or 'light' version - mainly it's the licensing and code protection that's different. It's pretty clear that either one is selling the result of your work or one is not... either / or.
Up-to-date? The OSS versions are continually keeping up with all the improvements...and many come from the OSS community itself. So what's the beef? If one wants to be on the bleeding edge with LC... then one has to step up to the plate... but I doubt if you've mastered livecode to the point where you really need the paid versions if you are experimenting .... what can you not build? On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Dirk prive <dirk.cleenwe...@gmail.com> wrote: > I still hope that a niche can be created for the less demanding hobby > group. Not all of us want to feel like freeloaders. > > And yes, I can donate, but > Stephen Barncard - Sebastopol Ca. USA - mixstream.org _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
