Yes, you got it exactly right. I think the community version is fine, but I like the company and the idea behind the product. That is why I have been paying for this for all this time. I can afford 999$/yr, so the company will lose a sale. Not just one sale, but a yearly sale. Don't forget I kept up to date since 2007. It'll be strange to not pay and use the community version, since that really is not how I want to use the product. I actually prefer supporting the company. Maybe I'm just strange. :)
Dirk Cleenwerck. On Feb 26, 2016 21:15, "J. Landman Gay" <jac...@hyperactivesw.com> wrote: > On 2/26/2016 1:38 PM, stephen barncard wrote: > >> I don't understand why the OSS version won't work for you if it's a >> 'hobby' >> thing >> > > I understand what he means. The OSS version would work fine, but that's > not the point. His point is that he thinks LC is losing money from those > who would like to contribute by purchasing a license at a reduced rate > (possibly restricted to personal use only, or something similar I'm > guessing.) > > It isn't that there is no path forward, but rather that he thinks the > current licensing model is costing the company some sales. I don't know if > that's true or not, I'm just playing interpreter. > > -- > Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com > HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode