Dear Jacque,

I don't want to enter into a debate but...
These logs are encrypted:
If I trust Runrev as they trust me *, there is no need to encrypt anything.
If it's encrypted (as said Mark S.), I'm right to ask me questions ;-)

In addition, I'll add that, AFAIK, only advanced users are able to know where these logs are and send them to Runrev:
So why so much secret?

I let you report this thread to Mark W. ;-)

* I could have put anything I wanted in the Rev Search Engine, including any url leading to any website.
Of course I never did it: Runrev trusted me and I trust them :-)

Le 6 août 08 à 20:48, J. Landman Gay a écrit :

Eric Chatonet wrote:
Bonsoir Jacque,
All you say is relevant as usual :-)
But I would add (because I discussed some times ago with Mark Waddingham) that these extended Win logs are not readable by us, poor humans, but by Runrev only. So, it's a bit frustrating to make the effort to send something you absolutely don't understand. Some header in clear would help... and not feel as we were guinea pigs only ;-)
The result: a few crash reports are finally sent.

True. But I think if that's what RR needs to diagnose the crash, then we need to send it. If we do not, Mark won't have the info he needs to work on the problem.

--
Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com

Best regards from Paris,
Eric Chatonet.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Plugins and tutorials for Revolution: http://www.sosmartsoftware.com/
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/
----------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to