Sorry, I cannot see anything 'stinky' or inadequate about saying what Runtime Revolution is.
I know that "Dropping your drawers and mooning them is a good way to make a name for yourself" (having done the written equivalent of that on this list in the past); but I don't see what that has to do with what to call the language inside Runtime Revolution. As to "ass clowns" . . . certainly very few of them contribute to the Runtime Revolution Use-List methinks. Mikey write: "The tone is merely a vehicle to illustrate the point plainly." Been there, Done that; and guess where it got me? All that sort of tone serves to do is rub people up the wrong way and turn them right off your 'plain point'. A spade may well be a 'spade', rather than a 'manually operated soil remover', but we don't have to call it a 'f***ing shovel'. I still think there is a lot to be said for 'RexTalk'. sincerely, Richmond Mathewson. ____________________________________________________________ A Thorn in the flesh is better than a failed Systems Development Life Cycle. ____________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution