I have to agree with François. There is no way that RunRev on their own could produce a multimedia tool to equal QT. We just have to hope that QT will be developed in such a way that in the future it will still work with those tools that edit QT movies. It's a poor show that Apple does not provide any idea about where QT is going, 18 months after QT X was first announced to developers. When this is seen along with the deprecation of past development information, there is not much else than hope. It may be that there will be a new set of cross-platform APIs, but there is no sign of that.
Perhaps it is time that RunRev started to look at providing a Flash player object. After all, there are open source actionscript compilers, and quite a few open source development tools for Flash. At least that would reduce the dependency on Quicktime alone. Bernard 2009/9/9 François Chaplais <francois.chapl...@mines-paristech.fr>: > > Le 9 sept. 09, à 11:28, Richmond Mathewson a écrit : > >> I believe it is in Runtime Revolution's interests to free themselves from >> a >> dependence >> on Quicktime; preferably "rolling their own" stuff to handle multimedia: > This is inconsistent. QTX is Apple rewriting as set of API for Quicktime; > and, as for most software products, the first release is not fully > satisfying. > You expect runrev, whose core expertise, IMHO, is not video, to do a better > job at it: starting from scratch to produce their own multimedia package. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution