I know that RR's expertise is not in the "QT territory"; but I still cannot helpthinking that beyond dependence on operating systems (well . . . Google Chrome, Runtime Revolution "Doors 95" . . . ) that it would behoove them to be less rather than more dependent on external software.
2009/9/9 François Chaplais <francois.chapl...@mines-paristech.fr> > > Le 9 sept. 09, à 11:28, Richmond Mathewson a écrit : > > Inevitably I am going to say what I have been banging on about for quite >> some time: >> I believe it is in Runtime Revolution's interests to free themselves from >> a >> dependence >> on Quicktime; preferably "rolling their own" stuff to handle multimedia: >> maybe so that >> all the multimedia capabilities offered by RR would work on Linux in >> exactly >> the same way >> as they work on Mac and Win. >> >> Sooner rather than later RR's dependency on Quicktime is going to prove an >> embarrassment; >> and, just possibly, that moment is already upon us. >> >> This is inconsistent. QTX is Apple rewriting as set of API for Quicktime; > and, as for most software products, the first release is not fully > satisfying. > You expect runrev, whose core expertise, IMHO, is not video, to do a > better job at it: starting from scratch to produce their own multimedia > package. C'mon. > Give credit to Apple: they acknowledge that QTX is not final by letting > folks use QT 7. > > Honestly, I'd rather see runrev fix the "text field beast". > > François > > > > > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution