I think you were merely stating the obvious. I have no connection to
RR and I use Rev every day to satisfy many client needs as well as my
own. My guess is that there will be more than one field object, since
many apps would not require an 'all singing all dancing' object in
every project. This would mean that the programmer could check off a
list of features to include depending on the project.
Merry Christmas everyone.
Jim Ault
Las Vegas
PS I will be working on a new internet business venture everyday for
the next couple weeks that includes the On-Rev server, so see you on
the list !!
On Dec 25, 2009, at 12:15 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
Richmond Mathewson wrote:
Well, as RunRev seem quite good at keeping some of the information
you mention below close to their collective chest
I can only go on what I see.
Well, I didn't think that a field rewrite was a secret, but now I
hope I haven't overstepped my NDA. Mostly I just wanted people to
know that RR is aware of the necessity but it isn't easy to do and
is going to take a lot of work.
--
Jacqueline
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
