Dar- Sunday, December 12, 2004, 2:04:10 PM, you wrote:
DS> And it also ties to recent discussion on parsing scripts. Should a DS> preprocessor allow for uncommented junk at the top level, or should it DS> assume a clean script? Well, for my own preprocessing purposes, anything not rigorously syntactically correct is an error. I suppose others may have differing needs. If nobody's said it yet, let me be the first to say that I think uncommented junk is still junk. -- -Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
