Dar Scott wrote: > You are assuming that a field and htmlText has something to do with > HTML. > > What do you base this assumption on? > > It is clear that htmlText is a view that is html-like. There is no > reason to expect it to process HTML when it is dumped into the property.
I think that RunTime made a bad choice in naming that property "htmlText". If it was never intended to render the full html spec, then it should have been named something like "taggedText". There would be no assumption that a property named "taggedText" would render html pages. That's my two cents. Roger Eller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
