Dar Scott wrote: > You are assuming that a field and htmlText has something to do with HTML. > > What do you base this assumption on?
Oh, I dunno, the name of the function beginning with "HTML?" The documentation which states, "Specifies the contents of a field, with its text formatting represented as HTML tags and special characters represented as HTML entities." And the detailed list of supported, unsupported, and custom HTML tags which follows? Seriously, this is a stretch. Consider the Rev text field the equivalent of a WAP 1.0 browser, or something like that. It is a bonafide HTML presentation, to the extent of what Rev text fields are capable of rendering. A relatively complete set of text formatting is available. Images are incorporated as appropriate. Links are handled. And so on. I assume the only reason the rendering is not more complete are the limitations of the field control and Rev itself. There can be no doubt that the intention of the function is to a) export the styled content of a text field as faithfully as possible using HTML and b) to render incoming HTML as properly as possible. The <title> element is specifically defined in the HTML specification: "The TITLE element is not considered part of the flow of text." > Stripping <title> is bizarre. No, it's exactly the right thing to do if you're implementing a function named HTMLText() that is designed to process HTML tags at best-effort. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution