On Aug 8, 2006, at 4:56 AM, Bill Marriott wrote:
Except that <title> has a defined, special meaning that Rev knows
about --
which is to specify the title of a document -- and that is by
definition
distinct from the content. The <foo> tag however, is undefined.
I believe that it's appropriate to "strip" out the information
between title
tags and to preserve the information between "foo" tags.
By reference, see:
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html3/HTMLandSGML.html
That is an HTML document.
You are assuming that a field and htmlText has something to do with
HTML.
What do you base this assumption on?
It is clear that htmlText is a view that is html-like. There is no
reason to expect it to process HTML when it is dumped into the property.
(Now, I do think htmlText when retrieved might be closer to HTML,
such as the handling of white space, but that is a different issue.
Maybe it is even possible for retrieved htmlText to closely render in
HTML.)
There is no reason to expect a field to process HTML when it is
dumped into the field's htmlText property.
Stripping <title> is bizarre.
Dar Scott
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
