Richard, > Is there of convention use widely enough to make alternatives easy to > dismiss?
Don't think there's a universally accepted practice. But I always liked the Claris/FileMaker model for public version numbers: 1.0 1.0v2 1.0v3 2.0 2.0v2 2.1 2.1v2 2.1v3 and so on. For the "private" or geeky build numbers, I use, for example: 2.1.3.45 which maps nicely to the public version numbers. You reset the least significant numeral each time you increment the one before it. 2.1.3.46 2.1.4.0 2.1.4.1 2.2.0.0 _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
