Sorry, I'm not following. Was this a typo: "With *1.6*, ... native
library can add up to 40%"?
What is the test you're running to evaluate performance? What are the
numbers you're seeing for each scenario you're testing?
Brown, Scott M (IS) wrote:
So with 1.7, we noticed the statement that utilizing the native library can add
up to 40% performance increase. With two identical systems, one with 1.6 one
with 1.7, we're not seeing any notable difference at all with either queries or
large ingests.
Any idea what operations can take advantage, or what circumstances the
performance boost comes into play?
