We're testing identical systems, one with 1.6, and one with 1.7 since it was mentioned (and I can't find the link again) that using the native library instead of java library gave the gain.. we are testing my performing a large rya ingest thru accumulo, and also using Rya Webview and retrieving large queries.. the ingest is ~90 min, so a good run, and the query is ~20k record return.
-----Original Message----- From: Josh Elser [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 10:02 AM To: [email protected] Subject: EXT :Re: 1.7 native library performance boost Sorry, I'm not following. Was this a typo: "With *1.6*, ... native library can add up to 40%"? What is the test you're running to evaluate performance? What are the numbers you're seeing for each scenario you're testing? Brown, Scott M (IS) wrote: > So with 1.7, we noticed the statement that utilizing the native library can > add up to 40% performance increase. With two identical systems, one with 1.6 > one with 1.7, we're not seeing any notable difference at all with either > queries or large ingests. > > Any idea what operations can take advantage, or what circumstances the > performance boost comes into play?
