oops sorry I was off by 10...I meant 2.29 not 2.19.

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 2:55 PM Evan Galpin <evan.gal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the link/info. v2.19.0 and v2.21.0 did exhibit the "faster"
> behavior, as did v2.23.0. But that "fast" behavior stopped at v2.25.0 (for
> my use case at least) regardless of use_deprecated_read setting.
>
> Thanks,
> Evan
>
>
> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 2:47 PM Steve Niemitz <sniem...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> use_deprecated_read was broken in 2.19 on the direct runner and didn't do
>> anything. [1]  I don't think the fix is in 2.20 either, but will be in 2.21.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14469
>>
>> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 1:41 PM Evan Galpin <evan.gal...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I forgot to also mention that in all tests I was setting
>>> --experiments=use_deprecated_read
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Evan
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 1:39 PM Evan Galpin <evan.gal...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hmm, I think I spoke too soon. I'm still seeing an issue of overall
>>>> DirectRunner slowness, not just pubsub. I have a pipeline like so:
>>>>
>>>> Read pubsub  |  extract GCS glob patterns  |  FileIO.matchAll()  |
>>>> FileIO.readMatches()  |  Read file contents  |  etc
>>>>
>>>> I have temporarily set up a transform between each step to log what's
>>>> going on and illustrate timing issues.  I ran a series of tests changing
>>>> only the SDK version each time since I hadn't noticed this performance
>>>> issue with 2.19.0 (effectively git-bisect). Before each test, I seeded the
>>>> pubsub subscription with the exact same contents.
>>>>
>>>> SDK version 2.25.0 (I had a build issue with 2.24.0 that I couldn't
>>>> seem to resolve) and onward show a significant slowdown.
>>>>
>>>> Here is a snippet of logging from v2.25.0:
>>>>
>>>> *May 12, 2021 11:11:52 A.M.* com.myOrg.myPipeline.PipelineLeg$1
>>>> processElement
>>>> INFO: Got file pattern: gs://my-bucket/my-dir/5004728247517184/**
>>>> May 12, 2021 11:16:59 A.M.
>>>> org.apache.beam.sdk.io.FileIO$MatchAll$MatchFn process
>>>> INFO: Matched 2 files for pattern
>>>> gs://my-bucket/my-dir/5004728247517184/**
>>>> May 12, 2021 11:23:32 A.M. com.myOrg.myPipeline.PipelineLeg$3
>>>> processElement
>>>> INFO: Got ReadableFile: my-file1.json
>>>> May 12, 2021 11:23:32 A.M. com.myOrg.myPipeline.PipelineLeg$3
>>>> processElement
>>>> INFO: Got ReadableFile: my-file2.json
>>>> May 12, 2021 11:24:35 A.M. com.myOrg.myPipeline.PipelineLeg$4
>>>> processElement
>>>> INFO: Got file contents for document_id my-file1.json
>>>> *May 12, 2021 11:24:35 A.M*. com.myOrg.myPipeline.PipelineLeg$4
>>>> processElement
>>>> INFO: Got file contents for document_id my-file2.json
>>>>
>>>> Note that end-to-end, these steps took about *13 minutes*. With SDK
>>>> 2.23.0 and identical user code, the same section of the pipeline took *2
>>>> seconds*:
>>>>
>>>> *May 12, 2021 11:03:39 A.M.* com.myOrg.myPipeline.PipelineLeg$1
>>>> processElement
>>>> INFO: Got file pattern: gs://my-bucket/my-dir/5004728247517184/**
>>>> May 12, 2021 11:03:40 A.M.
>>>> org.apache.beam.sdk.io.FileIO$MatchAll$MatchFn process
>>>> INFO: Matched 2 files for pattern
>>>> gs://my-bucket/my-dir/5004728247517184/**
>>>> May 12, 2021 11:03:40 A.M. com.myOrg.myPipeline.PipelineLeg$3
>>>> processElement
>>>> INFO: Got ReadableFile: my-file1.json
>>>> May 12, 2021 11:03:40 A.M. com.myOrg.myPipeline.PipelineLeg$3
>>>> processElement
>>>> INFO: Got ReadableFile: my-file2.json
>>>> May 12, 2021 11:03:41 A.M. com.myOrg.myPipeline.PipelineLeg$4
>>>> processElement
>>>> INFO: Got file contents for document_id my-file1.json
>>>> *May 12, 2021 11:03:41 A.M.* com.myOrg.myPipeline.PipelineLeg$4
>>>> processElement
>>>> INFO: Got file contents for document_id my-file2.json
>>>>
>>>> Any thoughts on what could be causing this?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Evan
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 9:53 AM Evan Galpin <evan.gal...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 2:09 PM Boyuan Zhang <boyu...@google.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Evan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you mean startup delay? Is it the time that from you start
>>>>>> the pipeline to the time that you notice the first output record from
>>>>>> PubSub?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes that's what I meant, the seemingly idle system waiting for pubsub
>>>>> output despite data being in the subscription at pipeline start time.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 12:50 AM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you try running direct runner with the option
>>>>>>> `--experiments=use_deprecated_read`
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> This seems to work for me, thanks for this! 👍
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Seems like an instance of
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-10670?focusedCommentId=17316858&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17316858
>>>>>>> also reported in
>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re6b0941a8b4951293a0327ce9b25e607cafd6e45b69783f65290edee%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We should rollback using the SDF wrapper by default because of the
>>>>>>> usability and performance issues reported.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 12:57 AM Evan Galpin <evan.gal...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I’m experiencing very slow performance and startup delay when
>>>>>>>> testing a pipeline locally. I’m reading data from a Google PubSub
>>>>>>>> subscription as the data source, and before each pipeline execution I
>>>>>>>> ensure that data is present in the subscription (readable from GCP
>>>>>>>> console).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I’m seeing startup delay on the order of minutes with DirectRunner
>>>>>>>> (5-10 min). Is that expected? I did find a Jira ticket[1] that at first
>>>>>>>> seemed related, but I think it has more to do with BQ than 
>>>>>>>> DirectRunner.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I’ve run the pipeline with a debugger connected and confirmed that
>>>>>>>> it’s minutes before the first DoFn in my pipeline receives any data. Is
>>>>>>>> there a way I can profile the direct runner to see what it’s churning 
>>>>>>>> on?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Evan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/BEAM-4548
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>

Reply via email to