Exactly.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Janne Jalkanen <janne.jalka...@ecyrd.com> wrote: > > I've been doing it for years with no technical problems. However, using "%" > as the escape char tends to, in some cases, confuse a certain operating > system whose name may or may not begin with "W", so using something else > makes sense. > However, it does require an extra cognitive step for the maintainer, since > the mapping between filenames and logical names is no longer immediately > obvious. Especially with multiple files this can be a pain (e.g. Chinese > logical names which map to pretty incomprehensible sequences that are > laborious to look up). > So my experience suggests to avoid it for ops reasons, and just go with > simplicity. > /Janne > On Aug 31, 2010, at 08:39 , Terje Marthinussen wrote: > > Beyond aesthetics, specific reasons? > > Terje > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Benjamin Black <b...@b3k.us> wrote: >> >> URL encoding. >> > >
