+1 for this if it is possible...
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Eric tamme <eta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> What I don't like about NTS is I would have to have more replicas than I
>> need. {DC1=2, DC2=2}, RF=4 would be the minimum. If I felt that 2 local
>> replicas was insufficient, I'd have to move up to RF=6 which seems like a
>> waste... I'm predicting data in the TB range so I'm trying to keep replicas
>> to a minimum.
>>
>> My goal is to have 2-3 replicas in a local data center and 1 replica in
>> another dc. I think that would be enough barring a major catastrophe. But,
>> I'm not sure this is possible. I define "local" as in the same data center
>> as the client doing the insert/update.
>
> Yes, not being able to configure the replication factor differently
> for each data center is a bit annoying. Im assuming you basically
> want DC1 to have a replication factor of {DC1:2, DC2:1} and DC2 to
> have {DC1:1,DC2:2}.
>
> I would very much like that feature as well, but I dont know the
> feasibility of it.
>
> -Eric
