On 7/18/2011 12:08 PM, Héctor Izquierdo Seliva wrote:
Interesting. So, there is no segregation between read and write cache
space? A compaction or flush can evict blocks in the read cache if it
needs the space for write buffering?
There are two versions, the -wt (write through) that will cache also
what is written, and the normal version that will only cache reads.
Either way you will pollute your cache with compactions.
If using the version that has both rt and wt caches, is it just the wt
cache that's polluted for compactions/flushes? If not, why does the rt
cache also get polluted?
