Ping... if anyone can help with this JXPath & DynaBeans problem I'd be
REALLY THANKFUL :)

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Andrew Hughes <ahhug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Howdy,
> I've taken Matt's suggestion onboard and I have investigated DynaBeans.
> These look pretty good for all intestive purposes and there's a code
> examples below how to build the data structure:
>
> + root [...@name="ROOT"]
>     + animal [...@name="ANIMAL"]
>         + dog [...@name="DOG"]
>             + boxer [...@name="BOXER"]
>             + labrador [...@name="LABRADOR"]
>         + cat [...@name="CAT"]
>             + tiger [...@name="TIGER-ONE"]
>             + tiger [...@name="TIGER-TWO"]
>             + tiger [...@name="TIGER-THREE"]
>             + lion [...@name="LION"]
>
>
> And the code looks like...
>
>  LazyDynaBean lazyDynaBean = new LazyDynaBean(); //the transparent root.
>  LazyDynaBean root = new LazyDynaBean();
> LazyDynaBean animal = new LazyDynaBean();
>  LazyDynaBean dog = new LazyDynaBean();
> LazyDynaBean cat = new LazyDynaBean();
>  LazyDynaBean boxer = new LazyDynaBean();
> LazyDynaBean labrador = new LazyDynaBean();
>  LazyDynaBean tiger1 = new LazyDynaBean();
> LazyDynaBean tiger2 = new LazyDynaBean();
>  LazyDynaBean tiger3 = new LazyDynaBean();
> LazyDynaBean lion = new LazyDynaBean();
>  //set the @name property of each bean, user UPPER to make them distinct
> for examples.
> root.set("name","ROOT");
>  animal.set("name","ANIMAL");
> dog.set("name","DOG");
>  cat.set("name","CAT");
> boxer.set("name","BOXER");
>  labrador.set("name","LABRADOR");
> tiger1.set("name","TIGER-ONE");
>  tiger2.set("name","TIGER-TWO");
> tiger3.set("name","TIGER-THREE");
>  lion.set("name","LION");
> //build the bean hierarchy.
>  lazyDynaBean.set("root",0, root);
> root.set("animal",0, animal);
>  animal.set("dog",0,dog);
> animal.set("cat",0,cat);
> dog.set("labrador",0,labrador);
>  dog.set("boxer",0, boxer);
> cat.set("tiger",0,tiger1);//duplicate
>  cat.set("tiger",1,tiger2);//duplicate
> cat.set("tiger",1,tiger3);//duplicate
>  cat.set("lion",0,lion);
>         JXPathContext context = JXPathContext.newContext(lazyDynaBean);
>         String query = "/root/animal/cat/tiger";
>         Object value = context.getValue(query);
>
>
> But there's a problem with JXPath querying this also. Absolute Paths like
>  '/root/animal/cat/tiger' or '/root/animal/cat/tiger'[2]' work perfectly.
> But I don't have anyluck doing "deep" searches. For examples the following
> just won't work.
> '//cat'
> //*...@name='LION']
> /root/animal/cat/tig...@name='TIGER-TWO']
>
> Things are looking up, but is this behavior to be expected?
>
> Cheers,
> --AH
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Andrew Hughes <ahhug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > From: Andrew Hughes <ahhug...@gmail.com>
>> > Subject: Re: JXPath over Generic Collection<?>, How?
>> > To: "Commons Users List" <user@commons.apache.org>
>> > Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 4:19 AM
>> > Still No Luck, I have removed recursive generic collections
>> > and have tried
>> > the following code... this is becoming a marathon effort
>> > :'(
>> >
>> > public class Thing {
>> >
>> >     public Thing(String name) {
>> >         this.name = name;
>> >     }
>> >     private String name = "";
>> >
>> >     public String getName() {
>> >         return name;
>> >     }
>> >     private ArrayList<Thing> children = new
>> > ArrayList<Thing>();
>> >
>> >     public ArrayList<Thing> getChildren() {
>> >         return children;
>> >     }
>> >
>> > }
>> >
>> >
>> >     public static void main(String[] args) {
>> >         //get some same data
>> >         Thing animal = new Thing("Animal");
>> >         //Animal.Dog.*
>> >         Thing dog = new Thing("Dog");
>> >         dog.getChildren().add(new
>> > Thing("Labrador"));
>> >         dog.getChildren().add(new
>> > Thing("Boxer"));
>> >         animal.getChildren().add(dog);
>> >         //Animal.Cat.*
>> >         Thing cat = new Thing("Cat");
>> >         cat.getChildren().add(new Thing("Lion"));
>> >         cat.getChildren().add(new
>> > Thing("Tiger"));
>> >         animal.getChildren().add(cat);
>> >
>> >         //run a query on it
>> >         JXPathContext context =
>> > JXPathContext.newContext(animal);
>> >         String query = "/Animal";
>> >         Thing result = (Thing) context.getValue(query);
>> >         String path = context.getPointer(query).asPath();
>> >         System.out.println("Ran '" + query +
>> > "' and got '" +
>> > result.getName() + "' on path '" + path +
>> > "'.");
>> >     }
>> >
>>
>> What would you be trying to select?  If you want to know how to look for a
>> given Thing in this graph, I can probably help.  If you want to know what
>> graph will allow you to use a preconceived notion of the xpath you want to
>> use, that will be harder.  You might use [beanutils] dynabeans in
>> conjunction with [jxpath] to try and achieve the latter.
>>
>> -Matt
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Andrew Hughes
>> > <ahhug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Yeah, that makes sense. The part that was confusing me
>> > is that if I
>> > > have...
>> > >
>> > > public class Thing {
>> > >
>> > >    private List<Thing> children;
>> > >
>> > > }
>> > >
>> > > I was assuming I would need to prefix all of my
>> > expressions "steps" with
>> > > '/children'. From what you said earlier this
>> > is not the case as collections
>> > > are "auto traversed/loaded".
>> > >
>> > > Thanks again matt! I won't get to test this out
>> > til later tonight be look
>> > > foward to seeing it working!!!
>> > >
>> > > Andrew
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Matt Benson
>> > <gudnabr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >> It should be as simple as Thing _containing_ a
>> > List<Thing> rather than
>> > >> _being_ a List<Thing>.  Composition over
>> > inheritance, do you see?
>> > >>
>> > >> HTH,
>> > >> Matt
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Andrew Hughes
>> > <ahhug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > From: Andrew Hughes
>> > <ahhug...@gmail.com>
>> > >> > Subject: Re: JXPath over Generic
>> > Collection<?>, How?
>> > >> > To: "Commons Users List"
>> > <user@commons.apache.org>,
>> > >> gudnabr...@yahoo.com
>> > >> > Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 7:06 PM
>> > >> > Matt, Thank You.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Is there any other data structure I can use
>> > that would work
>> > >> > with JXPath? My
>> > >> > requirement is that... a "Thing"
>> > can have contain
>> > >> > multiple child "Thing(s)"
>> > >> > (and the children are allowed to be
>> > non-unique).
>> > >> > This is equivalent to an XML element as it
>> > can contain
>> > >> > multiple child
>> > >> > elements, how do these guy's handle it I
>> > wonder?
>> > >> >
>> > >> > --Andrew
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Matt Benson
>> > >> > <gudnabr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > I admit I hadn't looked at this with
>> > a highly
>> > >> > critical eye, but this
>> > >> > > business of Thing extending
>> > ArrayList<Thing>
>> > >> > seems quite strange to me.
>> > >> > >  JXPath basically functions by
>> > "opening up"
>> > >> > collections automatically, so
>> > >> > > the very fact that Thing is itself a
>> > Collection
>> > >> > implies that a Thing will be
>> > >> > > opened up, and its children will be
>> > searched... but in
>> > >> > this example, either
>> > >> > > there are no children, at the leaves, or
>> > the children
>> > >> > themselves are
>> > >> > > (possibly empty) collections.  It looks
>> > as though
>> > >> > you're trying to represent
>> > >> > > a tree structure.  This may be a good
>> > example of a
>> > >> > reason for the idea of
>> > >> > > composition over inheritance.  I
>> > don't think
>> > >> > you're going to get any
>> > >> > > traction using JXPath with this object
>> > model.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Sorry for the bad news,
>> > >> > > Matt
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Andrew Hughes
>> > >> > <ahhug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > > From: Andrew Hughes
>> > <ahhug...@gmail.com>
>> > >> > > > Subject: Re: JXPath over Generic
>> > >> > Collection<?>, How?
>> > >> > > > To: "Commons Users List"
>> > >> > <user@commons.apache.org>
>> > >> > > > Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2009,
>> > 7:16 AM
>> > >> > > > Still busted. Example is now
>> > simplified. As soon
>> > >> > as a
>> > >> > > > generic Collection
>> > >> > > > becomes involved BOOM!
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > The Main Method to exec:
>> > >> > > > public class App {
>> > >> > > >     public static void main(
>> > String[] args ){
>> > >> > > >         JXPathContext context =
>> > >> > > > JXPathContext.newContext(new
>> > ThingRoot());
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> >
>> > System.out.println(((Thing)context.getValue("/root")).getName());
>> > >> > > >     }
>> > >> > > > }
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > The (populated) context root I am
>> > using, where
>> > >> > root is a
>> > >> > > > single object
>> > >> > > > holding a List of Thing's.
>> > >> > > > package jxpathresearch;
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > import java.util.ArrayList;
>> > >> > > > import java.util.List;
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > public class ThingRoot {
>> > >> > > >     private List<Thing> root
>> > new
>> > >> > ArrayList(); //this
>> > >> > > > will serve as the root.
>> > >> > > >     public ThingRoot() {
>> > >> > > >         Thing animal = new
>> > >> > Thing("Animal");
>> > >> > > >         root.add(animal);//Animal
>> > >> > > >         Thing dog = new
>> > Thing("Dog");
>> > >> > > >
>> > animal.add(dog);//Animal.Dog
>> > >> > > >         dog.add(new
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> >
>> > Thing("Labrador"));//Animal.Dog.Labrador
>> > >> > > >         dog.add(new
>> > >> > > >
>> > Thing("Boxer"));//Animal.Dog.Boxer
>> > >> > > >     }
>> > >> > > >     public List<Thing>
>> > getRoot() { return
>> > >> > root; }
>> > >> > > > }
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Finally here's a very simple
>> > 'Thing'
>> > >> > that
>> > >> > > > contains a List of Thing(s):
>> > >> > > > public class Thing extends
>> > ArrayList<Thing>
>> > >> > {
>> > >> > > >     public Thing(String
>> > name){this.name = name;}
>> > >> > > >     private String name =
>> > "";
>> > >> > > >     public String getName() {return
>> > name;}
>> > >> > > > }
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > I can't query anything beyond
>> > /root, it
>> > >> > doesn't
>> > >> > > > seem to ever get traversed.
>> > >> > > > I would expect results for //Thing
>> > and
>> > >> > > > //thi...@name='Labrador']
>> > etc but I
>> > >> > > > get no results only exceptions.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > My brain is hurting.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:22 AM,
>> > Andrew Hughes
>> > >> > > > <ahhug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > > I've noew tested a whole
>> > heap of
>> > >> > expressions even
>> > >> > > > //name='Tiger' nothing
>> > >> > > > > works.
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:01
>> > AM, Andrew
>> > >> > Hughes
>> > >> > > > <ahhug...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > >> I got cracking on testing
>> > this out... no
>> > >> > luck
>> > >> > > > (yet). Here's my testing
>> > >> > > > >> code if some kind person
>> > could please
>> > >> > take a
>> > >> > > > look....
>> > >> > > > >> First my generic
>> > collection hierarchy
>> > >> > (which only
>> > >> > > > contains a name and
>> > >> > > > >> children)...
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >> package jxpathresearch;
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >> import
>> > java.util.ArrayList;
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >> public class HierarchyPojo
>> > extends
>> > >> > > > ArrayList<HierarchyPojo> {
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>     public
>> > HierarchyPojo(String name){
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > this.setName(name);
>> > >> > > > >>     }
>> > >> > > > >>     private String name =
>> > "";
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>     public String
>> > getName() {
>> > >> > > > >>         return name;
>> > >> > > > >>     }
>> > >> > > > >>     public void
>> > setName(String name) {
>> > >> > > > >>         this.name = name;
>> > >> > > > >>     }
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >> }
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >> Next, the wrapper for the
>> > root context
>> > >> > (as Matt
>> > >> > > > suggested) and populated
>> > >> > > > >> with animals...
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >> package jxpathresearch;
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >> public class
>> > CollectionRoot {
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>     private HierarchyPojo
>> > hierarchyPojo;
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>     public
>> > CollectionRoot(){
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>         //Animal
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>         hierarchyPojo =
>> > new
>> > >> > > > HierarchyPojo("Animal");
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>         //Animal.Dog
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>         HierarchyPojo dog
>> > = new
>> > >> > > > HierarchyPojo("Dog");
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > //Animal.Dog.Labrador
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>         dog.add(new
>> > >> > > >
>> > HierarchyPojo("Labrador"));
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>         //Animal.Dog.Boxer
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>         dog.add(new
>> > >> > > > HierarchyPojo("Boxer"));
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > //Animal.Dog.Mastiff
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>         dog.add(new
>> > >> > > >
>> > HierarchyPojo("Mastiff"));
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>         //Animal.Cat
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>         HierarchyPojo cat
>> > = new
>> > >> > > > HierarchyPojo("Cat");
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>         //Animal.Cat.Tiger
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>         cat.add(new
>> > >> > > > HierarchyPojo("Tiger"));
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > //Animal.Cat.Cougar
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>         cat.add(new
>> > >> > > > HierarchyPojo("Cougar"));
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > //Animal.Cat.Leopard
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>         cat.add(new
>> > >> > > >
>> > HierarchyPojo("Leopard"));
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>         //Add Animal.Dog
>> > &
>> > >> > Animal.Cat
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > hierarchyPojo.add(dog);
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > hierarchyPojo.add(cat);
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>     }
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>     public HierarchyPojo
>> > >> > getHierarchyPojo()
>> > >> > > > {return hierarchyPojo;}
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>     public void
>> > >> > setHierarchyPojo(HierarchyPojo
>> > >> > > > hierarchyPojo)
>> > >> > > > >> {this.hierarchyPojo =
>> > hierarchyPojo;}
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >> }
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >> Finally invoke and test...
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >> public class App
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >> {
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>     public static void
>> > main( String[]
>> > >> > args )
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>     {
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>         JXPathContext
>> > context =
>> > >> > > > JXPathContext.newContext(new
>> > >> > > > >> CollectionRoot());
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>         String query =
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> >
>> > "//hierarchypo...@name='Tiger']";
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>         String fName =
>> > >> > > > context.getValue(query).toString();
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > System.out.println("Ran
>> > >> > > > '"+query+"' and
>> > got
>> > >> > > >
>> > '"+fName+"'");
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>     }
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >> }
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >> Above, should find one
>> > entry for
>> > >> > > > 'name=Tiger' but it does
>> > not, I get an
>> > >> > > > >> exception. This still
>> > doesn't seem
>> > >> > to traverse
>> > >> > > > the Collection correctly. Any
>> > >> > > > >> help would be most
>> > welcome.
>> > >> > > > >> Exception in thread
>> > "main"
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> >
>> > org.apache.commons.jxpath.JXPathNotFoundException:
>> > >> > > > No value for xpath:
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > //hierarchypo...@name='Tiger']
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >> Thanks for reading,
>> > >> > > > >> Andrew
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at
>> > 10:24 PM, Andrew
>> > >> > Hughes
>> > >> > > > <ahhug...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>> Thanks Matt - I will
>> > test this out
>> > >> > tomorrow
>> > >> > > > when I am back in the
>> > >> > > > >>> office...
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>> Being constructive...
>> > >> > > > >>> Surely this should at
>> > least be a
>> > >> > precondition
>> > >> > > > check and throw a specific
>> > >> > > > >>> exception if it's
>> > not supported?
>> > >> > > > >>> Thank You
>> > >> > > > >>> --Andrew
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at
>> > 2:27 PM, Matt
>> > >> > Benson
>> > >> > > > <gudnabr...@yahoo.com>wrote:
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> Most likely your
>> > problem is not
>> > >> > with
>> > >> > > > generics, but simply with the fact
>> > >> > > > >>>> that JXPath has a
>> > hard time
>> > >> > using a
>> > >> > > > collection as its root.  The
>> > easiest
>> > >> > > > >>>> workaround is to
>> > use some parent
>> > >> > object to
>> > >> > > > hold a reference to your
>> > >> > > > >>>> container.
>> > >> > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> HTH,
>> > >> > > > >>>> Matt
>> > >> > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> --- On Sun,
>> > 2/8/09, Andrew
>> > >> > Hughes
>> > >> > > > <ahhug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> > From: Andrew
>> > Hughes
>> > >> > > > <ahhug...@gmail.com>
>> > >> > > > >>>> > Subject:
>> > JXPath over
>> > >> > Generic
>> > >> > > > Collection<?>, How?
>> > >> > > > >>>> > To:
>> > "Commons Users
>> > >> > List"
>> > >> > > > <user@commons.apache.org>
>> > >> > > > >>>> > Date: Sunday,
>> > February 8,
>> > >> > 2009, 5:09
>> > >> > > > PM
>> > >> > > > >>>> > Hi All,
>> > >> > > > >>>> > Hopefully the
>> > solution is
>> > >> > as easy as
>> > >> > > > the question. I would
>> > >> > > > >>>> > like to
>> > perform
>> > >> > > > >>>> > evaluation on
>> > a (very
>> > >> > simple) generic
>> > >> > > > collection... as you
>> > >> > > > >>>> > can see below
>> > >> > > > >>>> >
>> > (HeirarchyPojo). I should
>> > >> > be able to
>> > >> > > > ask for a
>> > >> > > > >>>> >
>> > HeirarchyPojo's with
>> > >> > > > >>>> >
>> > name='Bill' or the
>> > >> > 3rd
>> > >> > > > Child... The problem is that
>> > >> > > > >>>> > nothing ever
>> > evaluate on
>> > >> > > > >>>> > this data
>> > structure.
>> > >> > What's the
>> > >> > > > deal with Generic
>> > >> > > > >>>> > Collections
>> > and JXPath?
>> > >> > > > >>>> >
>> > >> > > > >>>> > p.s this is
>> > not in the
>> > >> > userguide and
>> > >> > > > would be a most
>> > >> > > > >>>> > welcomed
>> > addition (if
>> > >> > > > >>>> > we can nut
>> > this out with
>> > >> > your help).
>> > >> > > > >>>> >
>> > >> > > > >>>> > Cheers.
>> > >> > > > >>>> >
>> > >> > > > >>>> >
>> > >> > > > >>>> > package
>> > xpath.and.generics;
>> > >> > > > >>>> >
>> > >> > > > >>>> > import
>> > java.util.ArrayList;
>> > >> > > > >>>> >
>> > >> > > > >>>> > public class
>> > HeirarchyPojo
>> > >> > extends
>> > >> > > > >>>> >
>> > >> > ArrayList<HeirarchyPojo>{
>> > >> > > > >>>> >
>> > >> > > > >>>> >     public
>> > >> > HeirarchyPojo(){}
>> > >> > > > >>>> >
>> > >> > > > >>>> >     private
>> > String id;
>> > >> > > > >>>> >     private
>> > String name;
>> > >> > > > >>>> >
>> > >> > > > >>>> >     public
>> > String getId() {
>> > >> > > > >>>> >
>> > return id;
>> > >> > > > >>>> >     }
>> > >> > > > >>>> >
>> > >> > > > >>>> >     public
>> > void
>> > >> > setId(String id) {
>> > >> > > > >>>> >
>> > this.id = id;
>> > >> > > > >>>> >     }
>> > >> > > > >>>> >
>> > >> > > > >>>> >     public
>> > String getName()
>> > >> > {
>> > >> > > > >>>> >
>> > return name;
>> > >> > > > >>>> >     }
>> > >> > > > >>>> >
>> > >> > > > >>>> >     public
>> > void
>> > >> > setName(String name)
>> > >> > > > {
>> > >> > > > >>>> >
>> > this.name = name;
>> > >> > > > >>>> >     }
>> > >> > > > >>>> >
>> > >> > > > >>>> > }
>> > >> > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> > > > >>>> To unsubscribe,
>> > e-mail:
>> > >> > > > user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> > >> > > > >>>> For additional
>> > commands, e-mail:
>> > >> > > > user-h...@commons.apache.org
>> > >> > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> > >> > user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> > >> > user-h...@commons.apache.org
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> > user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> > >> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> > user-h...@commons.apache.org
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to