+1
Thanks Gary!
Martin Gainty
______________________________________________
> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 14:07:08 -0800
> Subject: Re: SCXML project
> From: garydgreg...@gmail.com
> To: user@commons.apache.org
>
> Guilherme,
>
> I have not seen much activity. We are all volunteers here, if you want the
> project to move forward, feel free to talk on this list, create Jiras, and
> provide patches.
>
> Gary
> On Jan 22, 2016 8:58 AM, "Guilherme Silveira" <guilhermecgss...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Folks
> >
> > I am new to FSM and new to SCXML. On the other hand, I am expert in
> > Simulink, expert in Java and expert in model based systems engineering.
> >
> > I am currently evaluating SCXML and I would like a*honest, non biased
> > opinion *on the status of SCXML project.
> >
> > What I would like to assert if this project has a future, the number of
> > developers, if the SCXML specification will ever reach a stable
> > status....and so on
> >
> > So far, I have noticed few integrations with proprietary softwares....
> > Simulink Stateflow does not export to SCXML, neither does IBM Rhapsody.
> >
> > How difficult would it be to create custom tool for these integrations? And
> > most important, is it REALLY possible to implement in Java all the
> > functionalities of Simulink Stateflow, without any drawback, with a
> > friendly user experience and a steep learning curve?
> >
> > ps: I am not from telecom industry
> >
