Ok Folks,
I will evaluate SCXML. BTW, I found these paper and it sounds interesting: http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/46457.pdf It looks like it exports Stateflow to SCXML On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Martin Gainty <mgai...@hotmail.com> wrote: > +1 > Thanks Gary! > Martin Gainty > ______________________________________________ > > > > > > Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 14:07:08 -0800 > > Subject: Re: SCXML project > > From: garydgreg...@gmail.com > > To: user@commons.apache.org > > > > Guilherme, > > > > I have not seen much activity. We are all volunteers here, if you want > the > > project to move forward, feel free to talk on this list, create Jiras, > and > > provide patches. > > > > Gary > > On Jan 22, 2016 8:58 AM, "Guilherme Silveira" < > guilhermecgss...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Folks > > > > > > I am new to FSM and new to SCXML. On the other hand, I am expert in > > > Simulink, expert in Java and expert in model based systems engineering. > > > > > > I am currently evaluating SCXML and I would like a*honest, non biased > > > opinion *on the status of SCXML project. > > > > > > What I would like to assert if this project has a future, the number of > > > developers, if the SCXML specification will ever reach a stable > > > status....and so on > > > > > > So far, I have noticed few integrations with proprietary softwares.... > > > Simulink Stateflow does not export to SCXML, neither does IBM Rhapsody. > > > > > > How difficult would it be to create custom tool for these > integrations? And > > > most important, is it REALLY possible to implement in Java all the > > > functionalities of Simulink Stateflow, without any drawback, with a > > > friendly user experience and a steep learning curve? > > > > > > ps: I am not from telecom industry > > > > >
