mvn package doesnt package (testcase fails) currently <testcase
name="testSCXMLExecutorTransitions02Sample"
classname="org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutorTest" time="0.03"> <error
type="java.lang.NullPointerException:">java.lang.NullPointerException: null at
org.apache.commons.logging.impl.SLF4JLog.isDebugEnabled(SLF4JLog.java:49) at
org.apache.commons.scxml2.env.SimpleContext.setLocal(SimpleContext.java:178) at
org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutionContext.initializeIOProcessors(SCXMLExecutionContext.java:358)
at
org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutionContext.attachInstance(SCXMLExecutionContext.java:397)
at
org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutor.attachInstance(SCXMLExecutor.java:398)
at
org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLTestHelper.testInstanceSerializability(SCXMLTestHelper.java:258)
at
org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutorTest.testSCXMLExecutorTransitions02Sample(SCXMLExecutorTest.java:139)
correct this small bug lurking in
org.apache.commons.scxml2.env.SimpleContext.java
/** * Assigns a new value to an existing variable or creates a new one.
* The method allows to shaddow a variable of the same name up the *
Context chain. * * @param name The variable name * @param value The
variable value * @see org.apache.commons.scxml2.Context#setLocal(String,
Object) * as someone forgot to initialize log toss a System.out.println
*/ public void setLocal(final String name, final Object value) {
getVars().put(name, value); try { if
(log.isDebugEnabled()) {
log.debug(name + " = " + String.valueOf(value)); }
} catch(NullPointerException npe) {
System.out.println("SimpleContext::setLocal log.isDebugEnabled() where
log="+log+" name="+name+" throws NPE"); } }
*Obrigado Guilherme*
MartÃn
> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 23:42:01 -0200
> Subject: Re: SCXML project
> From: guilhermecgss...@gmail.com
> To: user@commons.apache.org
>
> Ok Folks,
>
>
> I will evaluate SCXML.
>
> BTW, I found these paper and it sounds interesting:
>
> http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/46457.pdf
>
> It looks like it exports Stateflow to SCXML
MG>will Stateflow support Harel FSM?
MG>Please confirmMG>Obrigado!
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Martin Gainty <mgai...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> > Thanks Gary!
> > Martin Gainty
> > ______________________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 14:07:08 -0800
> > > Subject: Re: SCXML project
> > > From: garydgreg...@gmail.com
> > > To: user@commons.apache.org
> > >
> > > Guilherme,
> > >
> > > I have not seen much activity. We are all volunteers here, if you want
> > the
> > > project to move forward, feel free to talk on this list, create Jiras,
> > and
> > > provide patches.
> > >
> > > Gary
> > > On Jan 22, 2016 8:58 AM, "Guilherme Silveira" <
> > guilhermecgss...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Folks
> > > >
> > > > I am new to FSM and new to SCXML. On the other hand, I am expert in
> > > > Simulink, expert in Java and expert in model based systems engineering.
> > > >
> > > > I am currently evaluating SCXML and I would like a*honest, non biased
> > > > opinion *on the status of SCXML project.
> > > >
> > > > What I would like to assert if this project has a future, the number of
> > > > developers, if the SCXML specification will ever reach a stable
> > > > status....and so on
> > > >
> > > > So far, I have noticed few integrations with proprietary softwares....
> > > > Simulink Stateflow does not export to SCXML, neither does IBM Rhapsody.
> > > >
> > > > How difficult would it be to create custom tool for these
> > integrations? And
> > > > most important, is it REALLY possible to implement in Java all the
> > > > functionalities of Simulink Stateflow, without any drawback, with a
> > > > friendly user experience and a steep learning curve?
> > > >
> > > > ps: I am not from telecom industry
> > > >
> >
> >
