YW. I think you could sort files if I refactor the monitor a bit such that
you can plug in a custom comparator (it's already there internally)...

Gary

On Mon, Jan 29, 2024, 5:19 PM Thomas, Patrick R
<patrick.r.tho...@questdiagnostics.com.invalid> wrote:

> Thanks for the quick response. I will need to test its behavior for lost
> connections.
>
> Based on what I have discovered so far, I will have to create my own
> monitor. I need to create a list of new files from all of the monitored
> folders during each pass and then sort them by date/time to make sure they
> are processed in the correct order.
>
> It doesn't seem to notify about files that already exist. I will have to
> add this as well, although it is optional because it doesn't work correctly
> in my current system.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Patrick R. Thomas
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 2:05 PM
> To: Commons Users List <user@commons.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Evaluating FileAlterationMonitor
>
> CAUTION! This email originated outside of Quest Diagnostics. DO NOT click
> links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
> content is safe. Please report suspicious emails to:
> ph...@questdiagnostics.com
>
>
> The documentation we have is on the site and the Java document. If you
> have improvements on the code or documentation, we welcome them as PRs on
> GitHub.
>
> The monitor thread wakes up, looks around, and fires events. If a file is
> not there because a network connection is broken, this will show up as a
> deleted file.
>
> YYMV since we do not test this use case in unit tests.
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024, 1:45 PM Thomas, Patrick R
> <patrick.r.tho...@questdiagnostics.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Our application monitors multiple folders for new files to import.
> > Once a new file is detected, it is moved to a working folder where it
> > is processed and then moved to an archive folder. Files are never
> > updated, and ones that are deleted before processing are skipped. The
> > current implementation has the folders on the same server as the
> > application. We are using Java's WatchService to do the monitoring.
> > For security reasons, we have to move to a new design where the
> > folders will be on a different server. My understanding is that
> > WatchService will not work well for this. I am evaluating
> > FileAlterationMonitor as an alternative. I have several questions. Is
> > there additional documentation I can reference? If the folder being
> > monitored is on a mapped network drive and the connection is lost,
> > what happens? Can the monitor detect files that already exist when it
> > starts? It is also important that the files remain in the order they
> were created to be imported.
> >
> > Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Patrick R. Thomas
> > Software Engineer
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > The contents of this message, together with any attachments, are
> > intended only for the use of the person(s) to which they are addressed
> > and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Further,
> > any medical information herein is confidential and protected by law.
> > It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to use, review, copy,
> > disclose, or disseminate confidential medical information. If you are
> > not the intended recipient, immediately advise the sender and delete
> this message and any attachments.
> > Any distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachment, is
> > prohibited.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> The contents of this message, together with any attachments, are intended
> only for the use of the person(s) to which they are addressed and may
> contain confidential and/or privileged information. Further, any medical
> information herein is confidential and protected by law. It is unlawful for
> unauthorized persons to use, review, copy, disclose, or disseminate
> confidential medical information. If you are not the intended recipient,
> immediately advise the sender and delete this message and any attachments.
> Any distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachment, is
> prohibited.
>

Reply via email to