On 02 Jan 2014, at 20:49 , Jens Alfke <j...@couchbase.com> wrote: > > On Jan 2, 2014, at 4:20 AM, Robert Newson <rnew...@apache.org> wrote: > >> It is relevant, the OP could use multiple databases to expose the subset of >> documents to the appropriate subset of users. > > True. But FWIW, we found in 2012 that this setup is a hassle to configure > (i.e. provisioning user accounts on demand) and won’t scale to large numbers > of users (or subsets of users, if you partition that way.)
Out of curiosity, what scaling limit have you found? Is this documented somewhere? Best Jan -- > >> Mentioning Couchbase is not relevant. :) > > The Sync Gateway is replication-compatible with CouchDB. I think it’s as > relevant to mention here as, say, PouchDB. > > —Jens
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
