Hi Fabian, Interesting !
However YARN is still tightly couple to HDFS, is that seems wasteful to use only YARN without Hadoop ? Currently we are using Cassandra and CFS ( cass file system ) Cheers On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: > A strong argument for YARN mode can be the isolation of multiple users and > jobs. You can easily start a new Flink cluster for each job or user. > However, this comes at the price of resource (memory) fragmentation. YARN > mode does not use memory as effective as cluster mode. > > 2015-11-25 9:46 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org>: > >> > On 25 Nov 2015, at 02:35, Welly Tambunan <if05...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hi All, >> > >> > I would like to know if there any feature differences between using >> Standalone Cluster vs YARN ? >> > >> > Until now we are using Standalone cluster for our jobs. >> > Is there any added value for using YARN ? >> > >> > We don't have any hadoop infrastructure in place right now but we can >> provide that if there's some value to that. >> >> There are no features, which only work on YARN or in standalone clusters. >> YARN mode is essentially starting a standalone cluster in YARN containers. >> >> In failure cases I find YARN more convenient, because it takes care of >> restarting failed task manager processes/containers for you. >> >> – Ufuk >> >> > -- Welly Tambunan Triplelands http://weltam.wordpress.com http://www.triplelands.com <http://www.triplelands.com/blog/>
