Hi Gordon,
thanks for your response , So I have done a POC on state migration using
avro, it seems it works out well.
I am using custom avro serializer (with avro schema and (TypeSerializer,
TypeSerializerSnapshot) and based on that written my own custom serializer
for the scala case class that I am serialising (I am using rocksdb as
statedbackend).
So when I am evolve the class with any datatype I just change avsc(avro
schema json) and give old schema as well as new schema to serialise data
already in rocksDB to read and accordingly write it with new and it works
just fine. So I can add new class to my application supporting schema
evolution,
I have define state like this :
private[this] lazy val stateDescriptorTest:
ValueStateDescriptor[TestDataNested] =
new ValueStateDescriptor[TestDataNested]("testdata-join",
TestDataNested.serializer)
private[this] lazy val stateTest: ValueState[TestDataNested] =
getRuntimeContext.getState(stateDescriptorTest)
Now the problem with the existing class in my current application we
have define state as follow (for example):
private[this] lazy val stateDescriptorTest:
ValueStateDescriptor[TestDataNested] =
new ValueStateDescriptor[TestDataNested]("testdata-join",
classOf[TestDataNested])
private[this] lazy val stateTest: ValueState[TestDataNested] =
getRuntimeContext.getState(stateDescriptorTest)
So when I provide TestDataNested.serializer Instead of
"classOf[TestDataNested]"
in my current application, basically replace the serialise it throws the
"new state serialiser is not compaitable.
What can I do here, would be great help thanks in advance
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 1:19 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi Apoorv,
>
> Sorry for the late reply, have been quite busy with backlog items the past
> days.
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 4:37 PM Apoorv Upadhyay <
> apoorv.upadh...@razorpay.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Gordon for the suggestion,
>>
>> I am going by this repo :
>> https://github.com/mrooding/flink-avro-state-serialization
>>
>> So far I am able to alter the scala case classes and able to restore from
>> savepoint using memory state backend, but when I am using rocksdb as
>> statebackend and try to restore from savepoint it break with following
>> error :
>>
>
> When you say restoring it with the RocksDB backend, was the savepoint you
> are attempting to restore from taken with the RocksDB backend as well?
> I'm asking that, because currently you cannot change the state backend
> across restores, as they have different savepoint binary formats.
> This is also the case when you use the State Processor API - when you load
> an existing savepoint, you first have to load it with the same state
> backend that was used to create the savepoint. You can change the state
> backend using the State Processor API, by creating a new savepoint with
> your desired target backend, and dumping all state data extracted from the
> loaded savepoint into the new fresh savepoint.
> There has been previous proposals (FLIP-41) [1] to unify the savepoint
> formats which would make a lot of this easier, but AFAIK this isn't on the
> roadmap in the near future.
>
> Best Regards,
> Gordon
>
> [1]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-41%3A+Unify+Binary+format+for+Keyed+State
>
>
>>
>> org.apache.flink.util.FlinkRuntimeException: Error while retrieving data
>> from RocksDB.
>> at
>> org.apache.flink.contrib.streaming.state.RocksDBValueState.value(RocksDBValueState.java:92)
>> at
>> nl.mrooding.ProductProcessor.processElement1(ProductProcessor.scala:14)
>> at
>> nl.mrooding.ProductProcessor.processElement1(ProductProcessor.scala:8)
>> at
>> org.apache.flink.streaming.api.operators.co.KeyedCoProcessOperator.processElement1(KeyedCoProcessOperator.java:78)
>> at
>> org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.io.StreamTwoInputProcessor.processInput(StreamTwoInputProcessor.java:238)
>> at
>> org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.TwoInputStreamTask.run(TwoInputStreamTask.java:117)
>> at
>> org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask.invoke(StreamTask.java:302)
>> at org.apache.flink.runtime.taskmanager.Task.run(Task.java:711)
>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
>> Caused by: java.io.EOFException
>> at org.apache.avro.io.BinaryDecoder.ensureBounds(BinaryDecoder.java:473)
>> at org.apache.avro.io.BinaryDecoder.readInt(BinaryDecoder.java:128)
>> at org.apache.avro.io.BinaryDecoder.readIndex(BinaryDecoder.java:423)
>> at
>> org.apache.avro.io.ResolvingDecoder.doAction(ResolvingDecoder.java:290)
>> at org.apache.avro.io.parsing.Parser.advance(Parser.java:88)
>> at
>> org.apache.avro.io.ResolvingDecoder.readIndex(ResolvingDecoder.java:267)
>> at
>> org.apache.avro.generic.GenericDatumReader.readWithoutConversion(GenericDatumReader.java:179)
>> at
>> org.apache.avro.generic.GenericDatumReader.read(GenericDatumReader.java:153)
>> at
>> org.apache.avro.generic.GenericDatumReader.readField(GenericDatumReader.java:232)
>> at
>> org.apache.avro.generic.GenericDatumReader.readRecord(GenericDatumReader.java:222)
>> at
>> org.apache.avro.generic.GenericDatumReader.readWithoutConversion(GenericDatumReader.java:175)
>> at
>> org.apache.avro.generic.GenericDatumReader.read(GenericDatumReader.java:153)
>> at
>> org.apache.avro.generic.GenericDatumReader.read(GenericDatumReader.java:145)
>> at
>> nl.mrooding.state.CustomAvroSerializer$class.deserialize(CustomAvroSerializer.scala:42)
>> at
>> nl.mrooding.state.ProductSerializer.deserialize(ProductSerializer.scala:9)
>> at
>> nl.mrooding.state.ProductSerializer.deserialize(ProductSerializer.scala:9)
>> at
>> org.apache.flink.contrib.streaming.state.RocksDBValueState.value(RocksDBValueState.java:90)
>> ... 8 more
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 10:56 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Apoorv,
>>>
>>> Flink currently does not natively support schema evolution for state
>>> types using Scala case classes [1].
>>>
>>> So, as Roman has pointed out, there are 2 possible ways for you to do
>>> that:
>>> - Implementing a custom serializer that support schema evolution for
>>> your specific Scala case classes, as Roman suggested.
>>> - or, using the State Processor API [2] to migrate your case classes
>>> offline as a batch job
>>>
>>> For your question on how to implement a schema-evolution supporting
>>> serializer, can you share with me the problems you have met so far?
>>> Otherwise, if you take a look at the PojoSerializerSnapshot class, that
>>> would be a starting point to implement something similar for your case
>>> classes.
>>>
>>> As you will quickly realize, it's not simple, so I would strongly
>>> suggest trying out the approach of using the State Processor API.
>>> Either way, if you bump into any problems, feel free to let me know.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Gordon
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10896
>>> [2]
>>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/dev/libs/state_processor_api.html
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 1:04 PM Apoorv Upadhyay <
>>> apoorv.upadh...@razorpay.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot , Also can you share one example where these has been
>>>> implemented? I have gone through docs does not happen to work still
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 7:59 PM Khachatryan Roman <
>>>> khachatryan.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Apoorv,
>>>>>
>>>>> You can achieve this by implementing custom serializers for your state.
>>>>> Please refer to
>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.8/dev/stream/state/custom_serialization.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Roman
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 6:53 AM Apoorv Upadhyay <
>>>>> apoorv.upadh...@razorpay.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Roman,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have successfully migrated to flink 1.8.2 with the savepoint
>>>>>> created by flink 1.6.2.
>>>>>> Now I have to modify few case classes due to new requirement I have
>>>>>> created a savepoint and when I run the app with modified class from the
>>>>>> savepoint it throws error "state not compatible"
>>>>>> Previously there were no serializer used.
>>>>>> I now wish to support state schema Hence need suggestion how can i
>>>>>> achieve that ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 9:08 PM Khachatryan Roman <
>>>>>> khachatryan.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi ApoorvK,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I understand that you have a savepoint created by Flink 1.6.2 and
>>>>>>> you want to use it with Flink 1.8.2. The classes themselves weren't
>>>>>>> modified.
>>>>>>> Is that correct?
>>>>>>> Which serializer did you use?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Roman
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 8:38 AM ApoorvK <
>>>>>>> apoorv.upadh...@razorpay.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Team,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Earlier we have developed on flink 1.6.2 , So there are lots of
>>>>>>>> case classes
>>>>>>>> which have Map,Nested case class within them for example below :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> case class MyCaseClass(var a: Boolean,
>>>>>>>> var b: Boolean,
>>>>>>>> var c: Boolean,
>>>>>>>> var d: NestedCaseClass,
>>>>>>>> var e:Int){
>>>>>>>> def this(){this(false,false,new NestedCaseClass,0)}
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now we have migrated to flink 1.8.2 , I need help to figure out how
>>>>>>>> can I
>>>>>>>> achieve state schema evolution for such classes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. Is creating avro for these classes now, and implement avro
>>>>>>>> serialisation
>>>>>>>> will that work ?
>>>>>>>> 2. Or if I register kyroserialiser with protobuf serialiser at env?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please suggest what can be done here, or redirect for the avros
>>>>>>>> serialisation example.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Sent from:
>>>>>>>> http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
