On 6/9/05, Ross Gardler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > Ross Gardler wrote:
> >
> >>David Crossley wrote:
> >>
> >>>Maurice Lanselle wrote:
> >>
> >>>>2) How does one construct "AND" classification rules?
> >>>>
> >>>><sourcetype name="foo">
> >>>> <document-element local-name="foo"> && <document-element
> >>>> namespace="bar">
> >>>></sourcetype>
> >>>
> >>>I don't know if that is possible or needed. Perhaps there is another way.
> >>>It would be better if you provided an actual use-case.
> >>
> >>Using your example from earlier in this thread, AND would be:
> >>
> >>
> >>> <sourcetype name="foo">
> >>> <document-element local-name="foo">
> >>> </sourcetype>
> >>> <sourcetype name="bar">
> >>> <document-element namespace="bar">
> >>> </sourcetype>
> >>>...
> >>>...
> >>> <map:when test="foo">
> >>> <map:transform
> >>> src="{project:resources.stylesheets}/foobar2document.xsl" />
> >>> </map:when>
> >>> <map:when test="bar">
> >>> <map:transform
> >>> src="{project:resources.stylesheets}/foobar2document.xsl" />
> >>> </map:when>
> >>>...
> >
> >
> > Er, i am confused. That code snippet is exactly the same as the OR
> > situation. Did you forget to edit the code?
>
> Nope, I was being stupid. Seems my logic circuits blew, I thought an OR
> was something completely different. I even added a note to the effect:
>
> >>(note the above example was directly copied for the suggestion for OR,
> >>obviously in an OR you would have different actions within the test)
>
> Just to be clear, the above is obviously an OR, I hope Maurice saw
> through my idiocy and didn't waste much time on that.
>
> I've had almost a whole nights sleep now, so maybe my logic circuits
> have repaired themselves. However, they are not telling me how to do an
> AND I'm afraid.
Nesting should get the AND effect. It does seem there's no direct way
about it though.
--tim
For example,
<map:when test="foo">
<map:when test="bar">
<map:transform
src="{project:resources.stylesheets}/foobar2document.xsl" />
</map:when>
</map:when>
