Yes, by merging the jms module into app ear deployment.  But now we really
need to keep them separate because other apps depend on that jms module
also.

Can you make these two fixes happen sooner because we really really really
need them in order to upgrade?

Thanks


Donald Woods-2 wrote:
> 
> OPENEJB-889 may not happen until their 3.1 release and Geronimo 2.2, but 
> didn't you find a work-around for this, by changing the app packaging?
> 
> 
> -Donald
> 
> 
> jklcom99 wrote:
>> Is there a time line for these two fixes?
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3316 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-889
>> 
>> We really need these to migrate to G2x.
>> 
>> Thank you
>> 
>> 
>> Donald Woods-2 wrote:
>>> No, and I've updated https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3316 
>>> with some fix versions so this doesn't fall of our radar again.  Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>> -Donald
>>>
>>>
>>> jklcom99 wrote:
>>>> Kevan,
>>>>
>>>> Is there a way to tell Geronimo to ignore the manifest classpath that
>>>> is
>>>> included in the jars while deploying instead of just flat out failed? 
>>>> Looks
>>>> like Geronimo does not like "." notation, reference to a directory such
>>>> as
>>>> "../somelib" or any jars that it cannot resolved in the ear lib.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/deploy-offline%2C-Deployer-operation-failed%3A-Failed-to-expand-the-module-archive-tp18226797s134p19459534.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to