You can check memory allocation at yarn-site. xml 

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
 
  On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Zoltán Zvara<zoltan.zv...@gmail.com> wrote:  
 Yes, I'm aware of that, but here we have very-long running containers. Nodes 
are from 100s to 1000s, it depends on the site. Memory and heap sizes are not 
known.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 1:56 PM Musty Rehmani <musty_rehm...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Containers are temporary.  They shut down after job is finished.  How many 
nodes in your cluster and what is the memory and heap size 


Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
 
  On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:44 AM, Zoltán Zvara

<zoltan.zv...@gmail.com> wrote:   The intent to move a container is to improve 
service-to-service locality, co-locate services to reduce bottlenecks 
introduced by network. The idea that a certain parallel process should be moved 
comes from an external service.
Speculation might not be effective here as I see, since the intent to move a 
container can be triggered hourly, daily, weekly or monthly - containers 
contain long running services, data pipelines. Or am I on the wrong line here? 
Can I simulate something like this with the current speculation?
Thanks for help!
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:17 PM Eric Payne <eric.payne1...@yahoo.com> wrote:

I think it would help if I knew what the criteria is for wanting to move the 
container. In other words, was the container started on an undesirable node in 
the first place? Or, did the node become undesirable after the container 
started.
Speculation could be considered a "move" operation for containers. If a 
container isn't finishing fast enough, the default speculator will start 
another container on a different node. Would it be possible to create a 
specialized speculator that understood your criteria for needing to move 
containers? If so, it could be done automatically / programatically.
Thanks,-Eric

      From: Zoltán Zvara <zoltan.zv...@gmail.com>
 To: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vino...@apache.org> 
Cc: user@hadoop.apache.org
 Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 9:10 AM
 Subject: Re: YARN re-locate container
  
How is this achieved? As far as I see it now, after stopping a container, the 
AM must reallocate the same container with the same resource vector but with 
locality preferences pointed to the new, target node. After the new leash has 
been acquired, then the AM can take it to the new node and initiate a 
`startContainers` message.Our use-case with Ericsson would require a more 
simple API, where (for example) a `moveContainer` call from the AM would ask 
the RM or NM to move a container from one node to another (or to any of the 
specified set of preferred nodes). Move would simply kill the container and 
restart it on another node at any given time whenever it is possible - I feel 
questions around scheduling: how container moves should be handled? Probably 
not like simple allocations.
Am I understanding the architecture correctly here?
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 7:31 PM Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vino...@apache.org> 
wrote:

Containers can be restarted on other machines already today - YARN just leaves 
it up to the applications to do so.

Are you looking for anything more specifically?

+Vinod

> On Mar 29, 2016, at 9:45 AM, Zoltán Zvara <zoltan.zv...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Hadoop Community,
>
> Is there any feature available, or on the road map to support the relocation 
> of containers? (Simply restart the container on another machine.)
>
> Thanks,
> Zoltán




 
  

  

Reply via email to