Do you not have a pseudo cluster for testing anywhere? On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 4:46 PM, anil gupta <anilgupt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jerry, > > I am wiling to do that but the problem is that i wiped off the HBase0.90 > cluster. Is there a way to store a table in HFilev1 in HBase0.92? If i can > store a file in HFilev1 in 0.92 then i can do the comparison. > > Thanks, > Anil Gupta > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Jerry Lam <chiling...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Anil: > > > > Maybe you can try to compare the two HFile implementation directly? Let > say > > write 1000 rows into HFile v1 format and then into HFile v2 format. You > can > > then compare the size of the two directly? > > > > HTH, > > > > Jerry > > > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:36 PM, anil gupta <anilgupt...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Hi Zahoor, > > > > > > Then it seems like i might have missed something when doing hdfs usage > > > estimation of HBase. I usually do hadoop fs -dus /hbase/$TABLE_NAME for > > > getting the hdfs usage of a table. Is this the right way? Since i wiped > > of > > > the HBase0.90 cluster so now i cannot look into hdfs usage of it. Is it > > > possible to store a table in HFileV1 instead of HFileV2 in HBase0.92? > > > In this way i can do a fair comparison. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Anil Gupta > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:13 PM, jmozah <jmo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Anil, > > > > > > > > I really doubt that there is 50% drop in file sizes... As far as i > > know.. > > > > there is no drastic space conserving feature in V2. Just as an after > > > > thought.. do a major compact and check the sizes. > > > > > > > > ./Zahoor > > > > http://blog.zahoor.in > > > > > > > > > > > > On 15-Aug-2012, at 12:31 AM, anil gupta <anilgupt...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > l > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > Anil Gupta > > > > > > > > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Anil Gupta > -- Kevin O'Dell Customer Operations Engineer, Cloudera
