And even the latest 2.9.x release, 2.9.2, was released at 2018 Nov, which
is also more than a year. Is this branch still alive?

Thanks.

张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月26日周四 上午9:37写道:

> We will only remove the hadoop 2.x support from hbase 3.x, which does not
> have a formal release plan yet, for 2.x we will still support hadoop 2.x.
>
> Wei-Chiu Chuang <weic...@apache.org> 于2019年12月26日周四 上午8:57写道:
>
>> With my Hadoop hat's on, we have not yet officially declared Hadoop 2.8
>> EOL. I think the 2.8 download missing from the web page is just a mistake.
>>
>> That being said, some of the biggest Hadoop users (LinkedIn, Yahoo,
>> Microsoft) that I am aware of are moving up from 2.7/2.8 to 2.10, and that
>> 2.8.5 (the last version in the 2.8 line) was released in Sep 2018, more
>> than a year ago. It doesn't look like the community has the desire to
>> continue the 2.8 line.
>>
>> I think it is a little extreme to remove hadoop2 profile, given that
>> Hadoop
>> 2.9 and 2.10 are still active and I expect Hadoop 2 to stay around for at
>> least 2 years out.
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 8:41 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hadoop 2.8.x has been removed from the download page of hadoop so I
>> think
>> > it is time to bump the hadoop dependency to 2.9.x, on master an
>> branch-2.
>> >
>> > And the hadoop community is going to make 2.10.x the last minor release
>> > line for 2.x
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/cab84265d632b90d66dcd1ad957a7439a2c76a987c7e62feafb4812e%40%3Ccommon-dev.hadoop.apache.org%3E
>> >
>> >
>> > I think this is a sign that the community is moving forward to 3.x. So I
>> > propose we make the master branch hadoop3 only, This requires changing
>> the
>> > pom a bit to active hadoop3 profile by default and remove the hadoop2
>> > profile.
>> >
>> > Thoughts? Thanks.
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to