Anyway if we want to start releasing 3.x alpha versions, at least we need to have a release manager... Dang
Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> 于2020年1月4日周六 上午11:38写道： > Releasing HBase 3 snapshots off master would be fine by me. > > > On Jan 3, 2020, at 7:37 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > A while back I offered to start making hbase 3 alpha releases so we had > > something we could all refer to in test environments. That offer still > > stands. > > > > > > I personally would still rather those releases be off of the master > branch > > because we still have too many branches given our tooling for backports. > > > >> On Fri, Jan 3, 2020, 21:30 Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Why not start a branch-3 and begin SNAPSHOT releasing of this branch > right > >> now? > >> > >> +1 to dropping Hadoop 2 support in HBase 3. We need the major increment > to > >> make this kind of change, let’s take the opportunity. > >> > >> Regarding Hadoop 2, the discussion I have seen indicates Hadoop thinks > it > >> will be releasing 2.x for up to two more years. I don’t know how many > >> releases there will actually be but let’s assume at least one more 2.9, > and > >> a few 2.10. My employer is expected to use these versions along a > >> transition path to 3.x for at least the next eighteen months. We are > >> probably typical. We won’t need Hadoop 2 support for a HBase 3 but will > >> need it for HBase 1 and HBase 2 for “a couple years”. > >> > >>>> On Jan 3, 2020, at 6:52 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> I personally like having Hadoop 2 support still, but I agree the > cadence > >>> out of Hadoop has been problematic. > >>> > >>> I would prefer we not change the state of Hadoop support in the master > >>> branch until we have a release plan of some kind for HBase 3. I'd > rather > >>> that be sooner rather than later. > >>> > >>>> On Fri, Jan 3, 2020, 18:08 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Support Hadoop 2.x in 3.0.0 means we need to carry it over the whole > 3.x > >>>> release lines, which seems to be a problem since the Hadoop community > do > >>>> not want to new 2.x release line any more... > >>>> > >>>> Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@gmail.com>于2020年1月4日 周六06:55写道： > >>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 5:38 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com > > > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> We will only remove the hadoop 2.x support from hbase 3.x, which > does > >>>> not > >>>>>> have a formal release plan yet, for 2.x we will still support hadoop > >>>> 2.x. > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Indeed there is no formal release plan for HBase-3.0, but I hope it's > >>>>> sooner than 2+ years away! What's the motivation for dropping Hadoop2 > >>>>> support? > >>>>> > >>>>> Wei-Chiu Chuang <weic...@apache.org> 于2019年12月26日周四 上午8:57写道： > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> With my Hadoop hat's on, we have not yet officially declared Hadoop > >>>> 2.8 > >>>>>>> EOL. I think the 2.8 download missing from the web page is just a > >>>>>> mistake. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> That being said, some of the biggest Hadoop users (LinkedIn, Yahoo, > >>>>>>> Microsoft) that I am aware of are moving up from 2.7/2.8 to 2.10, > and > >>>>>> that > >>>>>>> 2.8.5 (the last version in the 2.8 line) was released in Sep 2018, > >>>> more > >>>>>>> than a year ago. It doesn't look like the community has the desire > to > >>>>>>> continue the 2.8 line. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I think it is a little extreme to remove hadoop2 profile, given > that > >>>>>> Hadoop > >>>>>>> 2.9 and 2.10 are still active and I expect Hadoop 2 to stay around > >>>> for > >>>>> at > >>>>>>> least 2 years out. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 8:41 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) < > palomino...@gmail.com > >>>>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hadoop 2.8.x has been removed from the download page of hadoop so > I > >>>>>> think > >>>>>>>> it is time to bump the hadoop dependency to 2.9.x, on master an > >>>>>> branch-2. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> And the hadoop community is going to make 2.10.x the last minor > >>>>> release > >>>>>>>> line for 2.x > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/cab84265d632b90d66dcd1ad957a7439a2c76a987c7e62feafb4812e%40%3Ccommon-dev.hadoop.apache.org%3E > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I think this is a sign that the community is moving forward to > 3.x. > >>>>> So > >>>>>> I > >>>>>>>> propose we make the master branch hadoop3 only, This requires > >>>>> changing > >>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>> pom a bit to active hadoop3 profile by default and remove the > >>>> hadoop2 > >>>>>>>> profile. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thoughts? Thanks. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> >
