On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Raymond Wilson <raymond_wil...@trimble.com> wrote:
> Dmitriy, > > > > I set up an XML file based on the default one and added the two elements > you noted. > > > > However, this has brought up an issue in that the XML file and an > IgniteConfiguration instance can’t both be provided to the Ignition.Start() > call. So I changed it to use the DiscoverSPI aspect of IgniteConfiguration > and set LocalAddress to “127.0.0.1” and LocalPort to 47500. > > > > This did change the name of the persistence folder to be “127_0_0_1_47500” > as you suggested. > > > > While this resolves my current issue with the folder name changing, it > still seems fragile as network configuration aspects of the server Ignite > is running on have a direct impact on an internal aspect of its > configuration (ie: the location where to store the persisted data). A DHCP > IP lease renewal or an internal DNS domain change or an internal IT > department change to using IPv6 addressing (among other things) could cause > problems when a node restarts and decides the location of its data is > different. > > > > Do you know how GridGain manage this in their enterprise deployments using > persistence? > I am glad the issue is resolved. By default, Ignite will bind to all the local network interfaces, and if they are provided in different order, it may create the situation you witnessed. All enterprise users explicitly specify which network address to bind to, just like you did. This helps avoid any kind of magic in production. > > > Thanks, > Raymond. > > > > *From:* Dmitriy Setrakyan [mailto:dsetrak...@apache.org] > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 5, 2017 11:41 AM > > *To:* user <user@ignite.apache.org> > *Cc:* Raymond Wilson <raymond_wil...@trimble.com> > *Subject:* Re: Specifying location of persistent storage location > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Raymond Wilson <raymond_wil...@trimble.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > It’s possible this could cause change in the folder name, though I do not > think this is an issue in my case. Below are three different folder names I > have seen. All use the same port number, but differ in terms of the IPV6 > address (I have also seen variations where the IPv6 address is absent in > the folder name). > > 0_0_0_0_0_0_0_1_10_0_75_1_10_3_72_117_127_0_0_1_192_168_ > 121_1_192_168_178_27_192_168_3_1_2406_e007_9e5_1_9cc8_92bc_ > 50c9_6794_2406_e007_9e5_1_c5d8_af4b_55b2_582a_47500 > > > > , > > 0_0_0_0_0_0_0_1_10_0_75_1_10_3_72_117_127_0_0_1_192_168_ > 121_1_192_168_178_27_192_168_3_1_2406_e007_9e5_1_a58c_2f32_ > 8005_b03d_2406_e007_9e5_1_c5d8_af4b_55b2_582a_47500 > > 0_0_0_0_0_0_0_1_10_0_75_1_10_3_72_117_127_0_0_1_192_168_ > 121_1_192_168_178_27_192_168_3_1_2406_e007_38b4_1_858c_ > f0ab_bc60_54ab_2406_e007_38b4_1_c5d8_af4b_55b2_582a_47500 > > > > I start the nodes in my local setup in a well defined order so I would > expect the port to be the same. I did once start a second instance by > mistake and did see the port number incremented in the folder name. > > > > Are you suggesting the two changes you note below will result in the same > folder name being chosen every time, unlike above? > > > > > > Yes, exactly. My suggestions will ensure that you explicitly bind to the > same address every time. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > Raymond. > > > > *From:* Dmitriy Setrakyan [mailto:dsetrak...@apache.org] > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 5, 2017 11:17 AM > *To:* user <user@ignite.apache.org> > *Cc:* Raymond Wilson <raymond_wil...@trimble.com> > *Subject:* Re: Specifying location of persistent storage location > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Raymond Wilson <raymond_wil...@trimble.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I definitely have not had more than one server node running at the same > time (though there have been more than one client node running on the same > machine). > > > > I suspect what is happening is that one or more of the network interfaces > on the machine can have their address change dynamically. What I thought of > as a GUID is actually (I think) an IPv6 address attached to one of the > interfaces. This aspect of the folder name tends to come and go. > > > > You can see from the folder names below that there are quite a number of > addresses involved. This seems to be fragile (and I certainly see the name > of this folder changing frequently), so I think being able to set it to > something concrete would be a good idea. > > > > > > I think I understand what is happening. Ignite starts off with a default > port, and then starts incrementing it with every new node started on the > same host. Perhaps you start server and client nodes in different order > sometimes which causes server to bind to a different port. > > > > To make sure that your server node binds to the same port all the time, > you should try specifying it explicitly in the server node configuration, > like so (forgive me if this snippet does not compile): > > > > > > > > *<property name="discoverySpi"> <bean > class="org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.TcpDiscoverySpi"> > <property name="localPort" value="40123"/> </bean></property>* > > > > Please make sure that the client nodes either don't have any port > configured, or have a different port configured. > > > > You should also make sure that Ignite always binds to the desired local > interface on client and server nodes, by specifying > IgniteConfiguration.setLocalHost(...) > property, or like so in XML: > > > > *<property name="localHost" value="my.local.ip.address"/>* > > > > If my theory is correct, Ignite should make sure that the clients and > servers cannot theoretically bind to the same port. I will double check it > with the community and file a ticket if needed. > > > > >
