Hi guys,

as reminder, K4 is plan for end of April.

Regards
JB

On 03/17/2015 02:36 PM, Arnaud Deprez wrote:
I'd rather would like to see K4 released too but I don't know when it
will be planned.
As far as I know there are still lot of work to do for a K4 release.
As I'm not (yet) involved in it, it's a supposition based on the
changelog :-).

Currently, I think there are some confusion with the actual version
2.4.Z and 3.0.Z.
I think it's a bit strange to a lambda user that karaf 2.4.Z has a full
support for OSGi 5 and Karaf 3.0.Z has only a partial support.

So I think that

  * whether the documentation should be clearer to say that K3 will be
    abandoned
  * whether we should have a K3.1.Z release as JB said

I think the solution 2 is better regarding the lambda user than the
solution 1 but the work to do may be too hard if we have to throw it
away regarding K4.
I don't know actually.

Regards,

Arnaud

2015-03-17 13:51 GMT+01:00 Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com
<mailto:bcanh...@googlemail.com>>:

    well, I guess that would be true as a minor version upgrade on the
    framework would suggest a minor version bump on K3.

    tbh, I'd rather would like to see K4 released ... but it might be a
    possible solution to have a lighter "upgrade" to it again.

    regards, Achim

    2015-03-17 13:48 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net
    <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>:

        Hi Arnaud,

        if we move this way, it would make sense to go to Karaf 3.1.x as
        it's a major "update" on K3.

        But I think it makes sense.

        Thoughts ?

        Regards
        JB

        On 03/17/2015 01:42 PM, Arnaud Deprez wrote:

            Hi JB,

            I think it makes sense to upgrade the felix framework in K3
            at least to
            be aligned with K2.4.Z in order to avoid confusion.
            Or maybe K3 won't have any improvements and all the effort
            should be
            concentrated on K4.
            I think the documentation should be clearer for this topic,
            shouldn't it ?

            Regards,

            Arnaud

            2015-03-17 11:23 GMT+01:00 agrz
            <alexander.grze...@medisite.de
            <mailto:alexander.grze...@medisite.de>
            <mailto:alexander.grzesik@__medisite.de
            <mailto:alexander.grze...@medisite.de>>>:

                 Thank you for the Clarification.
                 Alex



                 --
                 View this message in context:
            
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.__com/Karaf-3-0-3-OSGi-Version-__tp4039091p4039114.html
            
<http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-3-0-3-OSGi-Version-tp4039091p4039114.html>
                 Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at
            Nabble.com.



        --
        Jean-Baptiste Onofré
        jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>
        http://blog.nanthrax.net
        Talend - http://www.talend.com




    --

    Apache Member
    Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
    OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
    Committer & Project Lead
    blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
    Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>

    Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master



--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to