Can we include these two points in upcoming release version - Making Kylin Compatible with Spark QL instead of Apache Calcite & having another Cube Storage apart from Hbase. Currently its supporting only Hbase rather its having support for columnar
Regards, Manoj From: prasanna lakshmi [mailto:prasannapadar...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2017 10:30 AM To: user@kylin.apache.org Subject: Re: Different backend storage (columnar) Please make it available different back end database.I am also facing the same issue in cluster. In my clusters physical servers are getting down because of kylin. Please make kylin as light weight tool. It's performance is too good but it needs so many other resources too.My<https://secureweb.jpmchase.net/readonly/http:/too.My> critical situation is all my kylin servers are getting down frequently,so it's affecting other applications also running in the same servers. Can you please tell me in what conditions kylin make servers to down physically. On Dec 9, 2017 3:13 AM, "Sonny Heer" <sonnyh...@gmail.com<mailto:sonnyh...@gmail.com>> wrote: We are using Kylin 1.6 for a while now. One the problems we continue to run into is having to maintain HBase backend. Typically regionservers go down for different reasons. We prefer to move to a columnar storage backend. I heard there was a version of kylin that replaced HBase? Any updates on this and where we can get a hold of this? Thanks This message is confidential and subject to terms at: http://www.jpmorgan.com/emaildisclaimer including on confidentiality, legal privilege, viruses and monitoring of electronic messages. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and notify the sender immediately. Any unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
