I agree with your points.. We should make the Adaptor to make it Hbase or 
Cassandra for Storage option. I will share my thoughts on this. On another 
line, Can we use Spark QL instead of Apache Calsite for Query engine? This will 
give better performance than currently as Spark will be running faster. All 
these should be get controlled by Properties File – based on User’s choice, 
Kylin code will follow the properties mentioned in the properties file.

I have 3 Suggestions


-        To read the input data from Parquet File/ORC/Sequence/Text File & 
Replace Hive table with HDFS file. File Metadata will be come Table Column/Data 
type & name of Table will be as File-Name.

-        Spark QL for Kylin query Engine

-        Cassandra as Storage layer for Kylin Cube processing.

Regards,
Manoj

From: ShaoFeng Shi [mailto:shaofeng...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 8:31 AM
To: user
Subject: Re: Different backend storage (columnar) - Kylin Improvement

Hello,

Both HBase and columnar are good options for Kylin's Cube storage, they all 
have advantages and disadvantages.

Columnar is just a format; with it, we still lack a service layer (like HBase 
service). Some vendor has implemented this by them own, but that is not open 
source.

When having lots of cubes in HBase, remember to review and optimize the Cube 
design, to minimize the scan and aggregation in HBase; Besides, monitor HBase 
metrics to know better about the workloads. Usually, set up a dedicated HBase 
cluster for Kylin would give you more flexibility to do customization and 
performance tuning, and also be good for stability. Some users are running the 
whole stack very well, but we also see some is struggling with the operations.

Someone raised other option before, like Cassandra, Kudu; but no follow-up. If 
you have some good idea on this and can make a proposal, that would be nice.

Anyway, such discussion and input are always welcomed.


2017-12-09 20:51 GMT+08:00 Kumar, Manoj H 
<manoj.h.ku...@jpmorgan.com<mailto:manoj.h.ku...@jpmorgan.com>>:
Can we include these two points in upcoming release version - Making Kylin 
Compatible with Spark QL instead of Apache Calcite & having another Cube 
Storage apart from Hbase. Currently its supporting only Hbase rather its having 
support for columnar

Regards,
Manoj

From: prasanna lakshmi 
[mailtoprasannapadar...@gmail.com<mailto:prasannapadar...@gmail.com>]
Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2017 10:30 AM
To: user@kylin.apache.org<mailto:user@kylin.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Different backend storage (columnar)


Please make it available different back end database.I am also facing the same 
issue in cluster. In my clusters physical servers are getting down because of 
kylin. Please make kylin as light weight tool. It's performance is too good but 
it needs so many other resources 
too.My<https://secureweb.jpmchase.net/readonly/http:/too.My> critical situation 
is all my kylin servers are getting down frequently,so it's affecting other 
applications also running in the same servers. Can you please tell me in what 
conditions kylin make servers to down physically.

On Dec 9, 2017 3:13 AM, "Sonny Heer" 
<sonnyh...@gmail.com<mailto:sonnyh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
We are using Kylin 1.6 for a while now.  One the problems we continue to run 
into is having to maintain HBase backend.  Typically regionservers go down for 
different reasons.

We prefer to move to a columnar storage backend.  I heard there was a version 
of kylin that replaced HBase?  Any updates on this and where we can get a hold 
of this?

Thanks

This message is confidential and subject to terms at: 
http://www.jpmorgan.com/emaildisclaimer<http://www.jpmorgan.com/emaildisclaimer>
 including on confidentiality, legal privilege, viruses and monitoring of 
electronic messages. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this 
message and notify the sender immediately. Any unauthorized use is strictly 
prohibited.



--
Best regards,

Shaofeng Shi 史少锋


This message is confidential and subject to terms at: 
http://www.jpmorgan.com/emaildisclaimer including on confidentiality, legal 
privilege, viruses and monitoring of electronic messages. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please delete this message and notify the sender 
immediately. Any unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.

Reply via email to